Leicester conspiracy theories

  • Thread starter Two-Lane Blacktop
  • Start date

Status
Not open for further replies.
Its not natural. Right?

Doping,
Referees who have been taken in by the romance of a fairy tale or
Richard III's disturbed soul casting a magical glow over the city?

Which is it?

I think it might be a Premier League fit-up to gain maximum exposure in Asia with the rise of the Chinese Super League. Utilize Leicester's owners King Power brand to do so.

It's no coincidence that David Icke was born in Leicester.

Lineker is the head of the FA
 
What about the 7 teams who have covered more ground than Leicester this season are they on drugs as well?

We were ranked 8th as of the 1st of March.

Cattermore running around like a headless chicken accounts for most of our 'ground covered'

Nevermind about Leicester, we will beat them 3-0 ...the wheels fall off and they don't get another point this season. Man Utd pip them for 4th spot.
 
Stole Dom pop itch.

Operation Puerto limps on

Last weekend's sports doping
story in the Sunday Times
brought forth all the usual
pledges from authorities that
they will do everything they
can to root out the dodgy
doctors. But is it really
as easy as all that?

Look at the biggest doping
scandal of recent years,
Operation Puerto. The Spanish
doctor who was convicted of
doping cyclists in 2013 said
that cycling made up just one
third of his clients. Athletes,
tennis players and footballers
were all implicated.

But instead of widening the
case, the judge involved in
Operation Puerto ordered all
of the evidence (more than
200 bags of blood) to be
destroyed – even though Dr
Fuentes told the court he
could identify all of the
samples. "If you give me
a list I could tell you who
corresponds to each code on
the packs." The judge was
having none of it.

The anti-doping agencies
tried to appeal the judge's
decision, so they could
out more cheats in other
sports. The appeal was held
in January and judgement was
supposed to have been given
within a week. That didn't
happen. Then it was supposed
to be within the first quarter
of the year. March has just
been and gone; still nothing.

The fate of those 211 bags of
blood still looks uncertain.
Which means there's a fair
few tennis and football stars
who can't rest easy yet.


------------------------------------
New Man City boss Pep Guardiola got
a seven month suspended prison
sentence for doping in 2001 (though
he appealed and quashed it in 2009).
 
I'm with you. I just can't see a rationale that can explain the gargantuan turnaround.

As I said on here last week, there's something they have done that we don't know about that's provided a superior level of energy. How they have done that I don't know, perhaps it's some kind of revolutionary training regime or maybe it's some kind of chemistry intervention. Time will tell
Confidence.
 
Fairytale, imo.

A fairytale about a load of frogs that turned into princes over the course of a summer, blessed with the miraculous powers of endurance, increased pace and the ability to recover freakishly quickly from injuries.

Such a miracle. So romantic.

Logon or register to see this image
 
Yep. As someone once said, "the harder I work, the luckier I get". That's what's behind it, IMO, nothing else.

You can expand that to the more synthetic erythropoietin I take, the harder I can work, and the harder I work the more lucky I get.

Athletes don't dope to make them faster or stronger. They dope because it enables them to train more, and more training makes them faster and stronger.

This is a good article on it.

Heredia: Epo increases the number of red blood cells and thus the transportation of oxygen, which is the key for every athlete: the athlete wants to recover quickly, keep the load at a constantly high level and achieve a constant performance.

SPIEGEL: Once again: a constant performance at the world-class level is unthinkable without doping?

Heredia: Correct. 400 meters in 44 seconds? Unthinkable. 71 meters with a discus? No way. You might be able to run 100 meters in 9.8 seconds once with a tailwind. But ten times a year under 10 seconds, in the rain or heat? Only with doping.


There's no way of ever knowing if Leicester's turnaround was achieved by fairs means or foul, but the precedent set elsewhere in the sporting world unfortunately means that applying scrutiny is necessary. I hope they're clean, because it's a brilliant story.
 
I think it's blood doping, possibly a new approach as everyone can dope. Like lance Armstrong though if you have the right DR's then you become the best doper.

Incidentally I'm annoyed they're making a film about him already, Hollywood is far to quick to tell us a story we've only just watched live.
Especially since it wasn't a very good film.
 
To be bottom this stage last year facing certain relegation with average players, to then end up as they are now on the brink of winning the premier league with huth, Simpson, albrighton and co... Is very suspicious, Liverpool have failed to win the premier since its formation with teams full of world class superstars... There's scandal buried somewhere here, I'm convinced

Same. It just doesn't seem plausible. I wouldn't be surprised in the least if there was something dodgy going on.
 
@Lewberry pie he's blowing your theory right out the water marra.
Maybe so, or maybe it's pointless making your back four cover needless ground so you have a midfield and front line that does it, and has am extra yard of pace along with increased endurance when it's needed later on in games.

In athletics or cycling there's and expression that if anyone is atba certain level then they're doping, I don't see any reason to think any team which is successful isn't also doping.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top