League one


Status
Not open for further replies.
I meant to say with only 8 points 5 points adrift of Ipswich.


I find that hard to believe given how bad they are.
How are they so bad though? People say we don't play to thier strengths but we are creating chances even if only 1 or 2 per game we aim to keep clean sheets so when the chance does come it needs to be taken.
 
See what happens when you make predictions before a ball has been kicked?

You come out with stuff like that.

But he's right.. We are, I'm not even concerned about the keeper tbh. Granted we could do with a striker but we certainly have by far the best defence in the league. We haven't even looked like we've struggled, we've dominated our league matches this season so far. We will have a run like Ipswich are having at some point, and Ipswich won't keep this up.
 
COVID gonna ravage the season imo. I’m amazed we didn’t play today having the majority of players available to us.
 
Should have played..
Am surprised Blackpool agreed to change given the start that Ipswich had made..... Thought grayson had got a decent side together but perhaps he's signed too many new players
 
We will bludgeon our way to glory, but Peterborough and Fleetwood will be more up tempo. Pompey and Hull will bore themselves up the table too.
 
Obviously missing the point cos it wasn’t me who said realistically we could have won all 4 games, I was making comments to demonstrate it wasn’t realistic at all. The reality is we have only won 2 out of 4. But crack on misreading things and making up your own scenarios.
The point I made - and I think you must have missed it - was that you were being critical of a poster for not sticking to reality, yet were arguing hypotheticals yourself.
I didn’t misread anything. I was simply pointing out the irony of your post.
It was me who - using your logic of ifs, buts and maybes - was saying we could have won all of our games despite not being very good.
 
The point I made - and I think you must have missed it - was that you were being critical of a poster for not sticking to reality, yet were arguing hypotheticals yourself.
I didn’t misread anything. I was simply pointing out the irony of your post.
It was me who - using your logic of ifs, buts and maybes - was saying we could have won all of our games despite not being very good.
I wasn’t being critical of him not sticking to reality, I was disputing his definition of it. His comment wasn’t realistic, it was idealistic. I was using the word, “realistically”, to demonstrate that and use it in the form that he did. So the reason you picked me up on it and not the other is because you agree with him. Just to clarify, I never made any bold statements on where we should have been after 4 games, the other poster did, claiming it was realistic. The reality is that we didn’t, and if you like, hypothetically, those games we drew could have gone either way. And as for your last sentence, you must agree with me, if we use, ifs, buts and maybes, we aren’t being realistic, you’ve just called him out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top