Kyle Lafferty - contract terminated...


Status
Not open for further replies.
To be fair Lafferty would have been a better option than Grigg and Graham. He also showed more in his first start against Gillingham than Wyke had shown since signing for us (up to that point).

His second game he was awful and subbed off at Bristol after being rattled by the crowd but the beauty of last year was that there was no crowd and the games were played with no intensity so he’d have been in his element.
 
There's a difference between most other posters and you though.
You peddle unrealistic club propaganda, suggesting performances are good when clearly they haven't been, promoting relentless positivity beyond even the happiest happy clapper.
That's combined with the occasional comment that you have behind the scenes/inside knowledge on the running of the club.
Some suggest you are Tom Sloanes.
Whether Sloanes himself or not, I do believe you are someone on the club's payroll.
That makes your ridiculous opinions actually quite scary.
That if you were really Tom Sloanes and although not dictating strategy or making decisions, in a position to make a comment that might have some influence actually terrifies me.
It would be concerning if he did have involvement in the club, but it would not be surprising considering how our expectation levels have been reduced to an all time low and subpar performances have become the norm now. If he considered Graham to be a good signing it really says it all, looking past his average record at Blackburn, he was at the end of his career and a very unpopular player during his previous stint at SAFC.

The arrogance and naivety from whoever signed him speaks volumes, they didn't consider how a signing like this would be perceived amongst the fans. The fans yet again were proven right.

For what it's worth, I think he's a WUM. A very serious one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top