• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Jermain Defoe (no longer a rumour)


A weird one. A few ITKs seem adamant Johnson had stopped the deal. He has said point blank we are working hard to get him here.

Maybe someone got the wrong end of the stick,? maybe he’s had a change of heart? I don’t think he’d string people along if the deal is off, just causing more problems in the long run that so I believe we are working on it.

Don’t know just hope it gets done.
Which ITK’s?
 
:lol: He works for the northern echo, its his job, he's a good journo

People's opinions on journalists here is hillarious, you have no idea mate.
Backs up a regime that cuts up a bloke in the same trade as him and cooks him in a tandoori oven

Yeah proper good journo great values
 
If you are referring to the Scott Wilson article you are wrong.
The article was obviously a load of rubbish, or should I say mainly the headline was a load of rubbish
Not really like. You don't know that.

Makes me laugh on here. If the journo had said he was signing, everyone would say "top journalist?
No the journalist made a headline that LJ didn't want defoe, when it's blatantly not true
 
Last edited:
Gone awfully quiet on here, I wonder why? 🤔

You’d expect the manager confirming we are trying to bring in a player everyone was desperate to sign yesterday would have everyone very excited!

Odd.

I will be generous and assume everyone if just enjoying their post match sup after a very good win.
Nah, that’s too generous. It’s gone quiet because the people who were calling for Johnson to be sacked as he didn’t fancy the Defoe deal have been made to look like the absolute cock-ends they are
 
If this comes off ,they will disappear for a while

My god
If Defoe fails to score after the first few games, the usual suspects will be on here blaming LJ for it.

Bloke behind me today blamed Johnson around a dozen times in the first half. Stuff like 'this is shite Johnson', 'Sort it out Johnson'. 'you don't have a clue Johnson'. I was very tempted to turn around and cup my ears at him after the goal. He had blamed Johnson for every mistake in the first half yet strangely did not give LJ any credit at all for the winning goal. I assume if hes responsible for a mis placed pass then he is also responsible for the winning goal? or maybe not............
 
The article was obviously a load of rubbish, or should I say mainly the headline was a load of rubbish

No the journalist made a headline that LJ didn't want defoe, when it's blatantly not true

its not a load of rubbish, he'd have been told that

Johnson put it right, thats fine, doesnt mean he wasn't told that, either by someone at SAFC or someone on defoe's end

its just people kicking off becausw they dont like the article

happens every single time
Backs up a regime that cuts up a bloke in the same trade as him and cooks him in a tandoori oven

Yeah proper good journo great values

:lol: what?

Are you Darren Grimes?
 
its not a load of rubbish, he'd have been told that

Johnson put it right, thats fine, doesnt mean he wasn't told that, either by someone at SAFC or someone on defoe's end

its just people kicking off becausw they dont like the article

happens every single time


:lol: what?

Are you Darren Grimes?
What? No I’m not
 
its not a load of rubbish, he'd have been told that

Johnson put it right, thats fine, doesnt mean he wasn't told that, either by someone at SAFC or someone on defoe's end

its just people kicking off becausw they dont like the article

happens every single time
This is a blatant example of a journalist reading between the lines and misinterpreting quotes. Then trying to claim an exclusive. You are totally naive and are showing an unwarranted amount of loyalty to a journalist who got it completely wrong and has quite frankly embarrassed himself. You are connected to the journalism/print world? It doesn't make you right, it makes you blind.
 
If Defoe fails to score after the first few games, the usual suspects will be on here blaming LJ for it.

Bloke behind me today blamed Johnson around a dozen times in the first half. Stuff like 'this is shite Johnson', 'Sort it out Johnson'. 'you don't have a clue Johnson'. I was very tempted to turn around and cup my ears at him after the goal. He had blamed Johnson for every mistake in the first half yet strangely did not give LJ any credit at all for the winning goal. I assume if hes responsible for a mis placed pass then he is also responsible for the winning goal? or maybe not............
It’s mad, isn’t it?
He was at fault for Flanagan missing the ball on the half-way line last week before Accrington scored, missing his clearance which led to Lincoln’s penalty and Winchester’s red card; and for Gooch’s airshot before Maguire got the third. I’ve seen and heard him blamed for almost every individual error a player makes. I don’t understand how that works
 
This is a blatant example of a journalist reading between the lines and misinterpreting quotes. Then trying to claim an exclusive. You are totally naive and are showing an unwarranted amount of loyalty to a journalist who got it completely wrong and has quite frankly embarrassed himself. You are connected to the journalism/print world? It doesn't make you right, it makes you blind.

I'm not naive like, that's you. You are totally missing the point.

Just proving my absolute point, kicking off as its something you dont wanna hear. Standard.

I know exactly how it works, especially at a local level, and especially at the northern echo.

The more you post, the more you prove my point.

Johnson's comments are welcome, and I always believed he wanted him, but doesnt have any impact on the merits of the article.
 
Back
Top