Jennings

[Yosemite Sam]

clueless there, as a professional player he surely must know that was outside leg

 

[markymark]

If he didn't Balance should have had doubts over line and where it pitched

 

[Jack Torrance]

Ballance should have told him to review

 

[Yosemite Sam]

Balance would stood on the next wicket alon, how could he have seen it? If you've faced it you should know where it has pitched

 

[LD19SAFC]

It was frustrating but it happens

 

[stanstheman]

clueless there, as a professional player he surely must know that was outside leg

Bit harsh on Jennings - pitched marginally outside leg - cannot know exactly where ball pitches and should rely on batting partner to assist.

 

[Bri]

Bit harsh on Jennings - pitched marginally outside leg - cannot know exactly where ball pitches and should rely on batting partner to assist.

Agree, on reply and slow-mo it looked a very fine call.

 

[Porridge]

Also, as a junior member of the team, he'd be conscious of not wanting to "waste" a review

Look how we laughed at Shane Watson

 

[Twisted]

clueless there, as a professional player he surely must know that was outside leg

fucks sake. the umpire watching for it got it wrong but jennings didn't review and is clueless.

stick to football please

 

[The Voice Of Reason]

Opening bat not using a review when you could see it was tight is a sin mind

 

[Voice of fair play]

clueless there, as a professional player he surely must know that was outside leg

I think it's fair to say when a cricket ball is coming down at around 90 mph, and you see it once, it's a lot harder to tell than when you have seen slow motion replays on the telly.

 

[maghater]

Just watched it on the highlights shocker of a decision by the umpire, would have thought Jennings was quite confident when he went to talk to Ballance, opening batsmen tend to know where their stumps are, so it would be interesting to know what was said. Must also be team instructions on reviews puzzling

 

[Twisted]

I think it's fair to say when a cricket ball is coming down at around 90 mph, and you see it once, it's a lot harder to tell than when you have seen slow motion replays on the telly.

this sounds like common sense to me.

we need pitchforks, we need flaming torches, everybody needs to get mobilised

 

[rentaghost]

I think it's fair to say when a cricket ball is coming down at around 90 mph, and you see it once, it's a lot harder to tell than when you have seen slow motion replays on the telly.

I dont know like. Ive faced bowling of 80mph+ and I reckon I know when its pitched outside leg. I'm surprised he didnt call for a review without hesistation.

 

[Rip Van Fish]

I dont know like. Ive faced bowling of 80mph+ and I reckon I know when its pitched outside leg. I'm surprised he didnt call for a review without hesistation.

Exactly mate.

You should know where your stumps are.

But I guess as it's a Durham player it can't really be his fault.

 

[Voice of fair play]

I dont know like. Ive faced bowling of 80mph+ and I reckon I know when its pitched outside leg. I'm surprised he didnt call for a review without hesistation.

So have I and I found it difficult to put bat on ball never mind know where it pitched

Seriously I think hard to tell at one pace one look at the speed it happens, you would imagine a test batsman would be able to tell, but its never as clear as it looks on the telly.

 

[eddyfinn]

with the new rules around reviews being reset after 90overs any opener these days should be reviewing most lbw decision obviously bar the absolute plumb ones

 

[The Voice Of Reason]

Their decision not to review Broad was absolute madness at that stage

 

[LD19SAFC]

almost ran out for 0 in the second innings

 

[smoker]

Useful, Compton-esque 33