Zak's Dad
Striker
You got your facts wrong with Sweden though, or you were trying to be cute and employing a snapshot in time. At the end of the day Sweden lie 5th in Europe per capita despite the other countries having prolonged and economically ruinous lockdowns. If we don't get a vaccine, and Oxford are now saying theirs is only 50% due to, wait for it, not enough Covid-19 patients to trial it on then unless we get some immunity in the population (and these other "model" countries you cite will face the same problems) there will be constant lockdowns and restrictions. In my opinion its better that a large chunk of the population get exposed to the virus (27% in Stockholm and counting) whilst doing our utmost to protect those at most risk. It's largely a male thing (70% of hospital admissions are male) and its largely an obesity issue (again 70% of those males were obese). There's obviously a genetic element too but for the rest of those under 70 it poses only a small risk....as I said earlier equal to the risk of dying from any cause in a given year.
Id like to add that I'm in and out of care homes regularly in my job and the way some have handled this crisis has been appalling. Well into April several I called at still hadn't locked down and I saw little evidence that some actually had a plan. Some wards at various hospitals containing Covid-19 patients didn't seem to have rigorous protocols either. The government are fair game here but they haven't been helped by poor leadership in hospitals and care homes.
I wasn't wrong in my facts about Sweden:
Sweden has had 35,000 cases.
Sweden has had 4,000 deaths.
Last week Sweden had the highest per capita death rate in Europe (and indeed the world)
Sweden keeps bars and restaurants open despite highest coronavirus deaths per capita
UK toll closely follows Scandinavian nation
www.independent.co.uk
If my original post wasn't clear enough I sincerely apologise, I was indeed quoting last week's statistics about Sweden having the biggest per capita deaths as a snapshot of the data - this was not in any way to be "cute" - 4,000 unnecessary deaths is not something to smirk about or score points over. It was an attempt to highlight the fact that Sweden had not successfully dealt with Covid in the way that other countries have, and the steady death rate showed that the lack of lockdown was still having a significant and negative impact upon the unnecessary death rate.
The fact is we appear to be measuring "success" with different measures.
I look at New Zealand with only 21deaths and no new cases at all in the past 2 or 3 weeks returning to normal and reopening the economy quicker than other countries as a success.
You appear to believe that Sweden with no lockdown and 'business as usual with limited limited social distancing' with 35,000 cases, 4,000 deaths and a death rate still at around 150 deaths per day as a success.
I'm sorry but we're going to have to agree to differ - because I can't view that as in any way successful - as it in no way stopped what are purely predictable and avoidable deaths of loved ones.