How's the board going to fair?

[Deleted User 17809]

People who don’t attend shouldn’t be allowed an opinion. If you were a loyal fan then you wouldn’t have moved away.

How would that work then?

 

[Hair Flick]

It will FARE fine.

There will still be plenty to talk about so there won't be FEWER talking points.

In my opinion...

Who are you like? The Grammar Pol...

Carry on.

 

[007Iron]

How would that work then?

Like when you're not black, and can't have an opinion on racism.

 

[Tex]

I still miss the Speakeasy as well rather than the matchday thread, far better craic.

Ah the demand of “Speakeasy - NOW!” - the SMB equivalent of “Reet - OUTSIDE!” if someone had his feathers ruffled. Those were the days!

 

[Pants]

We'll be getting 40k per game next season when all the Ellis Short protesters return.

 

[Deleted User 17809]

Like when you're not black, and can't have an opinion on racism.

Oof!

Careful now - think the correct term is ‘poc’ (people of colour), but it changes daily dependent upon the level of outrage people want to release.

 

[Dave Herbal]

How would that work then?

You get retina scanned at the turnstile and before you post.

 

[Deleted User 17809]

You get retina scanned at the turnstile and before you post.

Sounds like a dystopian nightmare.

Watch Blade Runner 2049.

 

[Dave Herbal]

Sounds like a dystopian nightmare.

Watch Blade Runner 2049.

It’s only a nightmare if you’re not the one controlling it.

 

[Deleted member 27423]

Less people going to games, less interest generally so less talking points, will it lead to the remerger of SMB & PF?

This section is best part of board...always has been

 

[Typhoonftm]

I lived away for 22 years, I use car/train and sometimes aeroplanes

You could have just said you're an idiot.

 

[Kevj]

People who don’t attend shouldn’t be allowed an opinion. If you were a loyal fan then you wouldn’t have moved away.

Dave, while I understand your point, that philosophy would kill off the board. Away from PF, have you seen the number of opinionated people who know everything about every subject?

@Frijj couldn't post again

 

[Frijj]

Dave, while I understand your point, that philosophy would kill off the board. Away from PF, have you seen the number of opinionated people who know everything about every subject?

@Frijj couldn't post again

I see there’ll be some competition here.

No worries. I have caffeine and the 2019 copy of the Encyclopaedia Britannica.

COME AT ME BRO

 

[West_Winger]

I'm too old for the big dipper but I still love the dodge'ms

 

[Kevj]

I see there’ll be some competition here.

No worries. I have caffeine and the 2019 copy of the Encyclopaedia Britannica.

COME AT ME BRO

Fastest Googler in the west.

 

[Frijj]

Fastest Googler in the west.

I’ve perfected the art of typing PornHub in less than one second with just one hand.

 

[West_Winger]

I see there’ll be some competition here.

No worries. I have caffeine and the 2019 copy of the Encyclopaedia Britannica.

COME AT ME BRO

Logon or register to see this image

 

[Deleted User 2893]

Shove your bollox up your arse

On a forum the talking points are generated by people posting, if less people are using the board and posting opinions then there are less talking points

Fewer, I think

 

[Frijj]

Logon or register to see this image

I don’t wear glasses mate. Laser eyes remember.

 

[Dave Herbal]

Dave, while I understand your point, that philosophy would kill off the board. Away from PF, have you seen the number of opinionated people who know everything about every subject?

@Frijj couldn't post again

Once upon a time you’d bump into people in the pub and discuss the match from a terrace viewpoint. Now you bump into people who haven’t watched or listened to it and they still have a viewpoint, cos they followed a thread of someone else’s viewpoint on here.
It’s like Macar going on the radio to talk about incidents in the match that he couldn’t f***ing see.