How much do you rate looks?


Things change as you get older and wiser. Yes, of course you need to be physically attracted. However, other stuff becomes more important i.e., politics, music, sense of humour etc.

There's no way I could be in a relationship with someone who had fundamentally different political views regardless of what they looked like.
This, I'm playing the dating game ATM and tbh while there needs to be at least alittle attraction there that soon fades away if there's nee chemistry or they've got a shit personality.
 
Rather an average looking lass with a heart of gold and great crack / gets on with your mates really well than a 9 or 10 out of 10 who is a constant handful/hard work and a general nightmare to be with over a long period time and tolerate (I've had a few of the later types particularly in my late teens, early and mid 20s who turned out to be mental cases who I luckily binned off).
 
Last edited:
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Looks are part of an initial attraction. However, if the person isn’t compatible the looks are secondary and the person you behold becomes less beautiful. If they are lovely the beauty that is beheld increases. Also, as you get older you personality is written on your face. A beautiful 19 year old can look terrible at 40 if she is a cow.
 
When have I claimed you have sex with your foster daughter?
I never said you did, but as you seem to have been prompted into "Peado hunter mode" by your mate stripey, who made the initial accusations, how could I leave it out Have you told your wife and kids what you do on here, or your mates at work?

Have a look at the "Malicious Communications act" I used it to good effect a few years back. The police officer that oversaw the case (malicious emails) is Inspector James Ashton, why not drop him an email, tell him what you're doing and ask of the consequences.

[email protected]

Don't worry, it's a fine at the worse, it's the getting another job that's the problem.

ps. I may have some legal experience...I wasn't always a musician.
 
Last edited:
I'd say they're pretty important to both sexes in early on. It seems to me that women value different things more highly after that, mind. Looks are important to me when picking a partner.

My lass is a worldie looks and personality wise. I'm a lucky fella.
 
I never said you did, but as you seem to have been prompted into "Peado hunter mode" by your mate stripey, who made the initial accusations, how could I leave it out Have you told your wife and kids what you do on here, or your mates at work?

Have a look at the "Malicious Communications act" I used it to good effect a few years back. The police officer that oversaw the case is Inspector James Ashton, why not drop him an email, tell him what you're doing and ask of the consequences.

[email protected]

Don't worry, it's a fine at the worse, it's the getting another job that's the problem.

ps. I may have some legal experience...I wasn't always a musician.

Read your last post man you're bat shit mental
 
I'd say they're pretty important to both sexes in early on. It seems to me that women value different things more highly after that, mind. Looks are important to me when picking a partner.

My lass is a worldie looks and personality wise. I'm a lucky fella.
You know what to do
I never said you did, but as you seem to have been prompted into "Peado hunter mode" by your mate stripey, who made the initial accusations, how could I leave it out Have you told your wife and kids what you do on here, or your mates at work?

Have a look at the "Malicious Communications act" I used it to good effect a few years back. The police officer that oversaw the case (malicious emails) is Inspector James Ashton, why not drop him an email, tell him what you're doing and ask of the consequences.

[email protected]

Don't worry, it's a fine at the worse, it's the getting another job that's the problem.

ps. I may have some legal experience...I wasn't always a musician.
I have you on ignore, so not really a concern of mine, but it is apparent that you are the same poster as other have linked to.

Threatening and acting the victim when confronted with this is only displaying that it’s correct.

The questions about your foster daughter seems inappropriate, but curiously you haven’t just put them down.

I think it’s time to move on - I have no doubt you are a troubled individual, but you can’t expect special treatment on a forum like this.
 
Last edited:
The questions about your foster daughter seems inappropriate, but curiously you haven’t just put them down.
By your statement I'm guessing if asked the same question from a complete stranger you'd give an answer. If indeed I did deny the charge I could then be accused of lying. If I don't give a response it could be that I'm guilty as charged but do not care to tell a lie, thus indicating I have a solid moral platform, which would conflict with the moral crime I'm accused of.

ps. Where did I threaten someone?
 
Last edited:
By your statement I'm guessing if asked the same question from a complete stranger you'd give an answer. If indeed I did deny the charge I could then be accused of lying. If I don't give a response it could be that I'm guilty as charged but do not care to tell a lie, thus indicating I have a solid moral platform, which would conflict with the moral crime I'm accused of.

ps. Where did I threaten someone?
My answer would be “No”, probably followed by a questioning of the asker’s mental health.

Your latest reply doesn’t really make your point better - subjectively I’d say probably worse.

With all your police experience you’ll know innocent people have no problems answering questions with clear answers.

Your last question is either rethoric or ridiculous. I assume you can remember your latest posts.

Again: Time to move on - you can’t win this one
 
My answer would be “No”, probably followed by a questioning of the asker’s mental health.

Your latest reply doesn’t really make your point better - subjectively I’d say probably worse.

With all your police experience you’ll know innocent people have no problems answering questions with clear answers.

Your last question is either rethoric or ridiculous. I assume you can remember your latest posts.

Again: Time to move on - you can’t win this one
I thought you had me on ignore....consistency is key here.
 
Definitely has to be more. As the saying goes "no matter how beautiful the woman, there's always a bloke bored of shagging it".
I always wonder what a male porn star does when he gets home and his lass is wanting it. Given it's his job does he bump her, give her a quickie given he's been doing it already or give her the same work treatment? 🤣
 
I have, but other people quoting you brought my attention to your drivel.

Maybe you should try to respond instead of diverting. I’ll keep you on ignore but not on this thread.
You say you would answer a question about your personal life no problem, yet you haven't answered my non personal question from a previous post which was: Where did I threaten someone? I know the difference between a threat and relayed information...you obviously don't.
 
You say you would answer a question about your personal life no problem, yet you haven't answered my non personal question from a previous post which was: Where did I threaten someone? I know the difference between a threat and relayed information...you obviously don't.
I think your reference frame is limited.

But again, you probably know that and just try to be argumentative.

My references were clear. I understand why you don’t like to be exposed
 

Back
Top