Having to play a full back centre forward


Not even a loan to see us through to the end of the season? I’m not sure how many loans we are allowed but surely it could have been classed as an emergency saying as we didn’t have anyone else at the club to fit that position.
We were allowed up to 5 loans I believe
 
Grow up and take safc coloured spectacles off. This is genuine debate and I have been a season ticket holder for a lot of years by the way.

You can still love the club but recognise when they get it wrong and we have got it wrong when it comes to striker recruitment, badly wrong.
Theres a thread where Speakman is rated out of 10. Now those on there need to f***ing grow up. Go through the side and tell me how he deserves 0.
 
Aye But for a hapath of tar…

A young kid who has hardly played a game of man’s football and is not a target man and therefore not fit for purpose.
He's a centreforward and was one of our better players yesterday, has already scored for us and been in good positions an unlucky not to get more. He's a young lad getting to know the squad and how we play. Despite that crack on and ignore the fact we got him
 
Why do we not see these posts when we won 3 nil at the likes of Qpr?
I said after that game that it became end to end and could have easily conceded. Just like against Bristol City, we couldn't hold the ball up the field.

This place may as well start approving every post until certain posters are happy with the content being typed. Not allowed to mention certain stuff now... despite the manager moaning about it and criticising it. Not allowed on here though :rolleyes:
 
That’s still only one fit forward at the club. I’m not sure there will be another team in the top 4 divisions in this country who will have gone into the second half of the season with 1 untried, young, new to the club centre forward.
Ha'way man make your mind up, one minute you're moaning we had none and when corrected it makes no difference and we should have more than one.
What will be said if the young lad scores a hatrick against Stoke?
 
He's a centreforward and was one of our better players yesterday, has already scored for us and been in good positions an unlucky not to get more. He's a young lad getting to know the squad and how we play. Despite that crack on and ignore the fact we got him
He is going to be a good player but is not a target man and therefore not what the team needs at the moment. As said a blind man can see that snd so can our manager. It’s not rocket science.
 
There has been posts like this since the window closed, a blind man in a galloping horse can see we are horribly short up front and it's affecting the whole team
I totally agree, we all know ,TM knows, the team knows, and I'm sure now the owner knows. However banging on about it with the same point over and over again doesn't change anything, it's tedious man..
 
Ha'way man make your mind up, one minute you're moaning we had none and when corrected it makes no difference and we should have more than one.
What will be said if the young lad scores a hatrick against Stoke?
But he won't... because he isn't a striker. He's a good player but is a number 10.

Incredible so many people can't see jow it's affecting the team.
I totally agree, we all know ,TM knows, the team knows, and I'm sure now the owner knows. However banging on about it with the same point over and over again doesn't change anything, it's tedious man..
Why does Mowbray keep doing it then?
 
I totally agree, we all know ,TM knows, the team knows, and I'm sure now the owner knows. However banging on about it with the same point over and over again doesn't change anything, it's tedious man..
It tedious but it has to be mentioned when games are discussed and analysed. You can't just ignore it when talking about games, changes we could make, what we did well or did badly
 
Theres a thread where Speakman is rated out of 10. Now those on there need to f***ing grow up. Go through the side and tell me how he deserves 0.
Recruitment has generally been good but in terms of recruiting a striker it’s woeful.

I’m sure speakmen tried but given his record so far the owners pethaps should have backed him more. We should have had a plan b knowing how weak we are in this area.

Whoever’s fault it is we are woefully short up front and it’s costing us.
 
Ha'way man make your mind up, one minute you're moaning we had none and when corrected it makes no difference and we should have more than one.
What will be said if the young lad scores a hatrick against Stoke?
Gelhardt was lined up to come in & supplement RS, he was never a replacement, as soon as RS got injured a replacement should have been the priority.
 
It tedious but it has to be mentioned when games are discussed and analysed. You can't just ignore it when talking about games, changes we could make, what we did well or did badly
But you can only change a game with the players we've currently got on the books...
 
Recruitment has generally been good but in terms of recruiting a striker it’s woeful.

I’m sure speakmen tried but given his record so far the owners pethaps should have backed him more. We should have had a plan b knowing how weak we are in this area.

Whoever’s fault it is we are woefully short up front and it’s costing us.
Best post on the subject so far. LS can't spend what he isn't given.
 

Back
Top