Boris Bear
Striker
I agree out of town retail/ office has been bad for the centres.
Although I think the idea of “spreading development thinly” is exactly the right thing for a few reasons. It gives places without any employment opportunity on their own doorstep, lessening the need for commuting. Other businesses can thrive on the back of them. The idea of footfall into bigger centre ultimately means to the detriment of another place, as people provide that footfall and they’ve got to originate from somewhere! Eg It would have been entirely wrong for the people of Washington and Houghton if they didn’t have commercial centres just because they fell within the boundary Sunderland district and Sunderland could attract their business....footfall.
This is entirely right for the rest of the region too. The article suggests the cities of the north east “aren’t doing enough” for the surrounding towns. Why should it be like this? The surrounding towns should be thriving on their own steam, which is exactly my point. The evidence is in places like shields, jarrow, Whitley bay etc ARE struggling. the flow of shoppers and commerce goes one way. There hasn’t been the lauded trickle down benefits out of the commercial centre, the so-called London model hasn’t worked. These are observable problems now in towns around the region not any economic hypothesis by any government think thank. it should underscore that things need to change in the region because, overall it’s struggling
Yalreet Roker End