Games Review Sites

Discussion in 'Games and games consoles' started by houst69, Jan 29, 2019.

  1. houst69

    houst69 Striker

    What's everyone's bible for gaming reviews? Which online sites do you favour?
  2. jedi_toaster

    jedi_toaster Winger

    I just watch some gameplay on YouTube and see if it appeals. I’ve never found a reviewer that shares the same taste in games as me, or that I’d trust with my £60. Jim Sterling is pretty decent though.
    Nipple Salad and Some Random Guy like this.
  3. Pretty much what @jedi_toaster has said. Metacritic is useful for a broad range of critic and user scores. Worth A Buy is decent on YouTube along with Jim Sterling. Basically any YouTube channel that isn't greased to the nines with money and merch from publishers is useful to watch.
  4. Lester1979

    Lester1979 Winger

    I've always found Forbes to be pretty good at keeping it factual.
  5. jedi_toaster

    jedi_toaster Winger

    Worthabuy goes off it if there’s women in games. I called him out on it in a comment on a video and he said I was a millennial snowflake. I’m 41. Get bored of his sexist rants now.
    Some Random Guy and Flying Lotus like this.
  6. Haven't seen that one like. Guessing it was a Battlfield video(s)?
  7. jedi_toaster

    jedi_toaster Winger

    Nah. Formula one. He went leet.
  8. Of all the games :lol::lol:
  9. jacko100

    jacko100 Winger

    tin hat on but I like the IGN and gamespot reviews! (I know they're paid off etc etc!)
  10. moo

    moo Midfield

    Kotaku generally get across a good idea and feel of a game without being overly "ZOMG BEST GAME EVA" like a lot of mainstream gaming press.

    It's the only gaming site I trust.
  11. jedi_toaster

    jedi_toaster Winger

    I also think he’s a tit because he’s asking for 4,500 per month on Patreon (on top of his YouTube monetisation) cos he reckons that if you factor all the hours he puts in then that still leaves him only on minimum wage. He’s not wired right. Some of his gaming opinions are spot on, and I wish he’d stick to them....but, you know....the internet.
  12. I've been watching him in complete ignorant bliss :eek:
  13. Toddius

    Toddius Full Back

    I generally get a good feel for a game from its promo material, YouTube videos etc.

    Eurogamer is pretty good. Generally well-balanced reviews. You do get the odd one where the journo is clearly bias for or against a game for some reason, but most articles are sensible.
  14. Fetch Fletch

    Fetch Fletch Striker

    Eurogamer know their stuff, wish they'd bring back the points system though
  15. Lexingtongue

    Lexingtongue Striker

    EDGE is the only publication I take seriously. All these online review sites are suspect as fuck. Reviewers these days are too quick to hand out 9s and 10s.
  16. Some Random Guy

    Some Random Guy Striker

    Don't know about EDGE over all others, agree with the rest though.
    Nipple Salad likes this.
  17. Generally start with Metacritic as a base and read some good/some not so good. Also depends on the genre, i.e. if its a RPG look for sites that mainly do those.

    As mentioned above, digging around on YouTube can help.
  18. jedi_toaster

    jedi_toaster Winger

    It’s the times we live in mate. Everything has to be polarised so a game is either 9 or 10 or it’s worse than shit. Look at the drama when Jim Sterling gave the latest Zelda a 7, and his review caused the meta critic score to move a tenth of a percentage. But a 7 is a perfectly decent game, it just has the odd flaw and perhaps didn’t appeal to the reviewer like it appeals to others. I remember years ago I would be happy to buy a game that scored a 6 or 7 because it meant that there was plenty to like, and I might even like it more than the reviewer.
    Lexingtongue likes this.

Share This Page