Friend


Status
Not open for further replies.
Fletcher was marginally offside anyway.

We've been f***ing dreadful and have been outplayed by a league one side.

MOTD showed he was onside

Fletcher was offside so two wrongs made a right in that case.

No he wasn't.

Friend will be as just as bad for other PL teams it's not just us

He wasn't 'bad' for the mags last week when he didn't send Colback off :evil: he's a fcking wanker!!
 
Last edited:
Whether Fletcher should've buried it or not(yes he should be just put his foot through it) it doesn't alter the fact and does not excuse the fact it was a blatent a penalty and red card you'll see all season
 
Fletcher was marginally offside anyway.

We've been f***ing dreadful and have been outplayed by a league one side.
Wasn't like

he was f***ing woeful today. the slide tackle at the edge of the box right before fletcher got his legs taken out beneath him in the box and no f***ing calls on either. called a lot of decisions in favor bradford.

fuck kevin friend
He has something against us. Eg Browns red at stoke
 
Just looked at the stats. In his whole PL career he's issued 9 straight reds and two yellows on 8 occasions. 4 of the 9 reds and 2 of the 8 double yellows were Sunderland. That's some statistical blip...
He's got nowt against us he's just shit at his job get over it
 
In much longer careers Dean has given 1 straight red against Sunderland and Dowd 2... Yeah, it's just a blip...


FFS We beat Man City 4 times in row when they were best team in the league and us one of the worst,does that mean Man City were not trying against us must do of your logical,as they beat most other teams.

Every team will have a ref who has given them more reds than another,does that automatically mean he has something against them of course not,also does it not matter whether them reds were correct or not?
 
In much longer careers Dean has given 1 straight red against Sunderland and Dowd 2... Yeah, it's just a blip...
What's Friends record like for other clubs ?

He's just as shit in other games he takes charge of it's not just us FFS

In much longer careers Dean has given 1 straight red against Sunderland and Dowd 2... Yeah, it's just a blip...
From just over a week ago

ANGRY Stoke boss Mark Hughes last night accused referee Kevin Friend of bottling it when he failed to send off Jack Colback.

But aye he's just shit for us
 
If you take away the Sunderland games that he has reffed in The Premiership alone, he averages one red card every 5 and half games, when involved in Sunderland it is one in every 3 and a half. I very much doubt that our record is anywhere near one sending off every 3 or 4 games. He has refereed us more than any other side, not sure why as you would expect him to be about the same as Newcastle, but that is less than half the games, the last one being April 2014. Not sure why we deserve this fuckwit more than anyone else, even though the stats show he sends off more SAFC players than anyone else, has done it more regularly than his own record suggests and more regularly than SAFC games officiated by others (Marriner probably excluded)
He is either very unlucky to get all of the Sunderland games which have violent conduct, or he is bent. I know what I am going for
 
If you take away the Sunderland games that he has reffed in The Premiership alone, he averages one red card every 5 and half games, when involved in Sunderland it is one in every 3 and a half. I very much doubt that our record is anywhere near one sending off every 3 or 4 games. He has refereed us more than any other side, not sure why as you would expect him to be about the same as Newcastle, but that is less than half the games, the last one being April 2014. Not sure why we deserve this fuckwit more than anyone else, even though the stats show he sends off more SAFC players than anyone else, has done it more regularly than his own record suggests and more regularly than SAFC games officiated by others (Marriner probably excluded)
He is either very unlucky to get all of the Sunderland games which have violent conduct, or he is bent. I know what I am going for

I know which one makes more common sense but then again common sense in short supply with irrational football fans.
 
I know which one makes more common sense but then again common sense in short supply with irrational football fans.
his record speaks for itself. We don't get a player sent off every 3.5 games and he doesn't send players off every 3.5 games. Common sense would suggest that you can indeed get bent or shall we say biased referees. It happens in every industry, every profession and if you are indeed the voice of reason you would understand it instead of just assuming it could never happen. Oh no not the stiff upper lipped English surely not
Actually your self proclaimed Voice of Reason is a bit superior anyhow
 
his record speaks for itself. We don't get a player sent off every 3.5 games and he doesn't send players off every 3.5 games. Common sense would suggest that you can indeed get bent or shall we say biased referees. It happens in every industry, every profession and if you are indeed the voice of reason you would understand it instead of just assuming it could never happen. Oh no not the stiff upper lipped English surely not
Actually your self proclaimed Voice of Reason is a bit superior anyhow

Voice of fair play mate.

Records are there all the time like I say we beat Man City 4 times in a row (apparently with Friend ref twice) seen as they beat most other teams and we are one of the worst teams in the league only conclusion by your logical is they must not have tried against us.

Do you think that the records prove it? Or do you think coincidence?

There is no sensible reason why he would give us bad decisions on purpose (feel free to come up with one).

And I am sure if he was really bent as you suggest he could have found a way to let Man City beat us in them 2 games quite easily.
 
Last edited:
Voice of fairy play mate.

Records are there all the time like I say we beat Man City 4 times in a row (apparently with Friend ref twice) seen as they beat most other teams only conclusion by your logical is they must not have tried against us.

There is no sensible reason why he would give us bad decisions on purpose (feel free to come up with one).
Him anarl.
Maybe he doesn't like Man City either, it could happen. Then again you have only taken 4 games, with different players, different conditions which could affect a result, very selective indeed . I've put stats up there with the same ref and the same club throughout his whole career. Are you seriously suggesting that refs can't be biased. All they have to do is divulge which team they support. Mines Sunderland, I could referee a Millwall game but give them nowt
Did the Italians think that their refs were unbiased? Unless you know the mind of Kevin Friend, all you have is stats and they are out there for all to see. Now since you obviously know that Friend is honesty and integrity personified, I have news for you, Tony Blair didn't have evidence of weapons of mass destruction, Jimmy Savile really did fix it for some people and Bill Clinton did shag Monica Lewinsky. Deception, dishonesty, bias or whatever else happens at every level, even ones higher than refereeing football matches, so I'm not sure why you just instantly dismiss it. Maybe you are one, maybe you are honest and you think that you are all the same. I would suggest that it is pretty naive of you if you do.
 
Him anarl.
Maybe he doesn't like Man City either, it could happen. Then again you have only taken 4 games, with different players, different conditions which could affect a result, very selective indeed . I've put stats up there with the same ref and the same club throughout his whole career. Are you seriously suggesting that refs can't be biased. All they have to do is divulge which team they support. Mines Sunderland, I could referee a Millwall game but give them nowt
Did the Italians think that their refs were unbiased? Unless you know the mind of Kevin Friend, all you have is stats and they are out there for all to see. Now since you obviously know that Friend is honesty and integrity personified, I have news for you, Tony Blair didn't have evidence of weapons of mass destruction, Jimmy Savile really did fix it for some people and Bill Clinton did shag Monica Lewinsky. Deception, dishonesty, bias or whatever else happens at every level, even ones higher than refereeing football matches, so I'm not sure why you just instantly dismiss it. Maybe you are one, maybe you are honest and you think that you are all the same. I would suggest that it is pretty naive of you if you do.

See your point don't dismiss it all,what you say is possible just highly unlikely IMO, that a ref will put his career at risk by constantly giving bad decisions to a certain team on purpose.
 
See your point don't dismiss it all,what you say is possible just highly unlikely IMO, that a ref will put his career at risk by constantly giving bad decisions to a certain team on purpose.
I'm sure politicians may have felt the same marra
The thing is referees can always hide behind, "in the referees opinion" or "I didn't see it". Footballers cheat as well, don't forget, they are highly paid and under more scrutiny. Unfortunately the Premier League and its reputation is highly protected so they can "afford" these little blemishes against their name
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying he is corrupt/accepting bungs. I just tend to think that some refs can be biased and not give certain things that they will to other clubs and vice versa.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top