Flavonoids
Striker
then shes been brainwashed as its not islamic/in the koran
Organised religion and interpretation adapting or imposing on it's followers! whatever next!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
then shes been brainwashed as its not islamic/in the koran
then shes been brainwashed as its not islamic/in the koran
Straw man argument. You're completely ignoring cultural tradition in this. An equivalent to your argument, in terms of the complexity involved, would be more along the lines of-
The British government decide the best way to keep their security watertight is to devise a new language to be spoken on the mainland, so that noone outside of the UK can understand it, and all citizens of the UK have to learn it too. British people are free to speak British when outside of the UK, but within the UK itself they have to keep to this new secure language. It is proven that this makes the UK more secure.
Would you back the government then?
All religion is a form of brainwashing though, whichever way you interpret the text. "Believing" in something requires a level of either self brainwashing or unthinking acceptance.
il just do what you do and answer a question with a question. or in fact not bother at all. always the best way on these tyoe of threads
il just do what you do and answer a question with a question. or in fact not bother at all. always the best way on these tyoe of threads
should religion take priority over general law?
Religion has no place in the governance of a secular society, but that doesn't mean that a secular government shouldn't respect its populace's freedom to follow a religion if it so wishes.
Read more: http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?p=9769482#post9769482#ixzz1JIrypBcKyou could turn this round mind.
A western woman gogin to Saudi would have to cover her head and wear a long gown.
wouldn't be able to drive and need to be chaperoned everywhere..
when in Rome...
Are "their" women so ugly they have to be covered up?
Good grief.
Eh? How does that work as an example. Is Saudi even described as a "secular" society? The good thing about the west is that generally speaking you have freedom to express yourself, be it religiously or otherwise. Its shite that women have to do that when they go to Saudi, because it is a repressive, nasty regime. We should be more like Saudi...er no.
All religion is a form of brainwashing though, whichever way you interpret the text. "Believing" in something requires a level of either self brainwashing or unthinking acceptance.
brainwashed by men to think its religion, it isnt
its men suppressing women
All the muzzie haters suddenly supporting women's liberation![]()
Once again people are making a religious and racial issue where there isn't one.
France have banned the covering of your face except on Health and Safety grounds, i.e. Gas Masks etc.
That includes the Bhurka. They don't like it? Tough shit. One law for all. There is absolutely no need for it in Western Society. A Muslim woman can wear a full body garment and head scarf to stop her being "objectified", no need to cover her face. Talking to someone who you cannot see your face is just sheer bad manners.