Alcoholic_Author
Striker
I was just reading the recent Roker Report interview with a Huddersfield fan and he said something that resonated with me (bolded in purple):
I think this has often been at the crux of our success and failure, trying to balance the high expectations of the fanbase that can help maintain high standards with the reality that it is never going to be plain sailing all the time, and if players and staff are actually given the opportunity to recover in the eyes of the fans once they've been through a poor run or an outright failure.
I think we all understand that this is a big club and standards should be higher than some others, but at the same time if it results in constant failures is there space for us as a fanbase to reflect on that and amend expectations as strategy, like even though we all want a 100 point season in our heart of hearts, tempering that to something much more realistic and achievable, gives the club space to makes some errors in the knowledge that that we aren't going to lose our shit about it.
In recent years I have probably, as a strategy, had lower than average (compared to average Sunderland fans) expectations as a countermeasure. We're all individuals but as a fanbase we're also a collective, sometimes I feel like the expectations are so high it makes the club buckle at the first sign of poor form and the club act by sacking the manager or make a rash transfer decision etc
What’s the Championship really like? Terriers fan Matt says the secret to success is team spirit
The Championship can be a brutal slog, something that Terriers fan Matt Shaw knows only too well having watched his side get all the way to Wembley, only to fall at the final hurdle. What should Sunderland expect?
rokerreport.sbnation.com
RR: Why do you think well-established clubs struggle to gain momentum in the Championship, whereas in recent seasons smaller clubs like Luton and Barnsley have successfully broken into the Play-Offs and came close to promotion?
AHTTC Podcast: There are probably a lot of differing reasons. A lot of it is down to good ownership and planning. I can’t emphasise how much planning plays a part.
Forest, Leeds, Derby, Sheff Wed and a few others in the past have been guilty of throwing money around without a real coherent plan.
Short termism often fails in the Championship and with FFP looming, bad planning can then affect you for several years. Take our success in 2017 – it was driven by a plan with funds raised for that season over the previous 2/3 seasons.
Recruitment had a clearly devised plan; specific character traits were sought in players and we had a manager who did things slightly different from the norm. Same again last season. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t but when a club not of the stature of say Leeds like Bristol City tries this and fails people tend not to notice as much.
On the small clubs, I’d say that Bournemouth are one of the smallest clubs in the top two leagues - if not the smallest - but they have a huge financial advantage which allows them to compete at the top table so perhaps they are an anomaly.
For Barnsley and Luton these are clubs that can plan without pressure and so long as they’re pushing upwards then the fans are quite happy.
On the other end of that scale, it was felt at Elland Road in particular that several sides before the Bielsa one crumbled under the expectations of an impatient crowd.
Bigger clubs tend to have bigger expectations and smaller tolerance levels. They also go a bit mad when you win a few games and go full bunny boiler when you lose a few.
I don’t think that is helpful to a lot of clubs.
I think this has often been at the crux of our success and failure, trying to balance the high expectations of the fanbase that can help maintain high standards with the reality that it is never going to be plain sailing all the time, and if players and staff are actually given the opportunity to recover in the eyes of the fans once they've been through a poor run or an outright failure.
I think we all understand that this is a big club and standards should be higher than some others, but at the same time if it results in constant failures is there space for us as a fanbase to reflect on that and amend expectations as strategy, like even though we all want a 100 point season in our heart of hearts, tempering that to something much more realistic and achievable, gives the club space to makes some errors in the knowledge that that we aren't going to lose our shit about it.
In recent years I have probably, as a strategy, had lower than average (compared to average Sunderland fans) expectations as a countermeasure. We're all individuals but as a fanbase we're also a collective, sometimes I feel like the expectations are so high it makes the club buckle at the first sign of poor form and the club act by sacking the manager or make a rash transfer decision etc