Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would it clear it up though?
We have millions of clips of the two planes hitting the towers, these are disputed. I've heard people claim it's cgi etc so I imagine footage from the pentagon would be labeled the same.
You don't know that, it is only in your imaginaton. That is just bollocks. Provide evidence please.there might be millions of videos but there's only 2 different clips, i believe, of the planes hitting the towers and the main issue with the towers isn't what hit them, its more that they were brought down in their own footprint, in 10 seconds, in a controlled demolition, with the impact and fuel from the planes being blamed for melting the steel columns
those towers were designed to withstand multiple jumbo jet impacts and also could have withstand a 150 year continuous storm - thats provable fact, yet they tell us a relatively small fire that burned for around an hour was enough to bring them down in 10 seconds. at the time they were the tallest buildings in the world
I mean, where else other than their own footprint would you expect tall buildings to fall?
What you really mean here is, in your own mind, not "without doubt". You can't possibly know what unseen film would show. Or can you? How can you?would all without doubt clearly show
You don't know that, it is only in your imaginaton. That is just bollocks. Provide evidence please.
Seriously though, until you start to write like anything other than a 10 year old kid nobody is going to take you seriously. I mean, where else other than their own footprint would you expect tall buildings to fall?
some or any of the 84 recordings that the FBI are holding that show footage of the pentagon that day, and are currently the subject of a freedom of information act release request by the 911 truth movement, would really without doubt clear up whether it was flight 77 that crashed into it.
the fact is they are holding all of the vital evidence relating to one of the most serious crime scenes in Americas history, and are refusing to make it available to a major movement which represent tens of thousands of their own electorate, including some of the families of people who were supposed to be on the flight, who simply do not believe flight 77 crashed into the pentagon.
1. why was it all confiscated in such a rush
2. why are they refusing to release footage which would confirm what so many do not believe.
those towers were designed to withstand multiple jumbo jet impacts
So if it wasn't flight 77, then what was it?some or any of the 84 recordings that the FBI are holding that show footage of the pentagon that day, and are currently the subject of a freedom of information act release request by the 911 truth movement, would really without doubt clear up whether it was flight 77 that crashed into it.
the fact is they are holding all of the vital evidence relating to one of the most serious crime scenes in Americas history, and are refusing to make it available to a major movement which represent tens of thousands of their own electorate, including some of the families of people who were supposed to be on the flight, who simply do not believe flight 77 crashed into the pentagon.
1. why was it all confiscated in such a rush
2. why are they refusing to release footage which would confirm what so many do not believe.
there might be millions of videos but there's only 2 different clips, i believe, of the planes hitting the towers and the main issue with the towers isn't what hit them, its more that they were brought down in their own footprint, in 10 seconds, in a controlled demolition, with the impact and fuel from the planes being blamed for melting the steel columns
those towers were designed to withstand multiple jumbo jet impacts and also could have withstand a 150 year continuous storm - thats provable fact, yet they tell us a relatively small fire that burned for around an hour was enough to bring them down in 10 seconds. at the time they were the tallest buildings in the world
------------
there's cctv footage from the gas station, from the sheraton hotel and from the nearest highway to name 3 which have all been confiscated and would all without doubt clearly show flight 77's final approach and impact into the pentagon - you can't dispute footage of a crime scene which has been confiscated and withheld from the public domain
there might be millions of videos but there's only 2 different clips, i believe, of the planes hitting the towers and the main issue with the towers isn't what hit them, its more that they were brought down in their own footprint, in 10 seconds, in a controlled demolition, with the impact and fuel from the planes being blamed for melting the steel columns
those towers were designed to withstand multiple jumbo jet impacts and also could have withstand a 150 year continuous storm - thats provable fact, yet they tell us a relatively small fire that burned for around an hour was enough to bring them down in 10 seconds. at the time they were the tallest buildings in the world
------------
there's cctv footage from the gas station, from the sheraton hotel and from the nearest highway to name 3 which have all been confiscated and would all without doubt clearly show flight 77's final approach and impact into the pentagon - you can't dispute footage of a crime scene which has been confiscated and withheld from the public domain
there might be millions of videos but there's only 2 different clips, i believe, of the planes hitting the towers and the main issue with the towers isn't what hit them, its more that they were brought down in their own footprint, in 10 seconds, in a controlled demolition, with the impact and fuel from the planes being blamed for melting the steel columns
those towers were designed to withstand multiple jumbo jet impacts and also could have withstand a 150 year continuous storm - thats provable fact, yet they tell us a relatively small fire that burned for around an hour was enough to bring them down in 10 seconds. at the time they were the tallest buildings in the world
------------
there's cctv footage from the gas station, from the sheraton hotel and from the nearest highway to name 3 which have all been confiscated and would all without doubt clearly show flight 77's final approach and impact into the pentagon - you can't dispute footage of a crime scene which has been confiscated and withheld from the public domain
there might be millions of videos but there's only 2 different clips, i believe, of the planes hitting the towers and the main issue with the towers isn't what hit them, its more that they were brought down in their own footprint, in 10 seconds, in a controlled demolition, with the impact and fuel from the planes being blamed for melting the steel columns
those towers were designed to withstand multiple jumbo jet impacts and also could have withstand a 150 year continuous storm - thats provable fact, yet they tell us a relatively small fire that burned for around an hour was enough to bring them down in 10 seconds. at the time they were the tallest buildings in the world
------------
there's cctv footage from the gas station, from the sheraton hotel and from the nearest highway to name 3 which have all been confiscated and would all without doubt clearly show flight 77's final approach and impact into the pentagon - you can't dispute footage of a crime scene which has been confiscated and withheld from the public domain
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/dec/05/september11.usa
Bush says he saw the 1st plane hit live. He was in a classroom reading a book for the 2nd so the only live one he could've recalled had to be the 1st one hitting, the footage not being released until days afterwards.
Bush recollects watching a plane hit the towers on a tv before he joins the kids on that day and thinks pilot error (his words). He can't be talking about the 2nd one, because anyone who see's the 2nd plane hit, knows its not pilot error. Ergo he was watching some live secret feed that wasn't available to anybody else. How can that be explained away?
So in his own words....
-He watches the 1st plane hit on tv, thinks pilot error.
-Walks into the classroom, starts reading an upside down book.
-Gets whispered into the ear by the chief of staff informing of the 2nd one hitting.
-Stays there, finishes the talk with the kids and then pays attention to the attack afterwards.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/dec/05/september11.usa
Bush says he saw the 1st plane hit live. He was in a classroom reading a book for the 2nd so the only live one he could've recalled had to be the 1st one hitting, the footage not being released until days afterwards.
Bush recollects watching a plane hit the towers on a tv before he joins the kids on that day and thinks pilot error (his words). He can't be talking about the 2nd one, because anyone who see's the 2nd plane hit, knows its not pilot error. Ergo he was watching some live secret feed that wasn't available to anybody else. How can that be explained away?
So in his own words....
-He watches the 1st plane hit on tv, thinks pilot error.
-Walks into the classroom, starts reading an upside down book.
-Gets whispered into the ear by the chief of staff informing of the 2nd one hitting.
-Stays there, finishes the talk with the kids and then pays attention to the attack afterwards.
To any sane observer the Guardian article would simply reinforce their already held opinion that George W Bush had difficulty distinguishing his arse from his elbow and not that he was watching 'some live secret feed'.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/dec/05/september11.usa
Bush says he saw the 1st plane hit live. He was in a classroom reading a book for the 2nd so the only live one he could've recalled had to be the 1st one hitting, the footage not being released until days afterwards.
Bush recollects watching a plane hit the towers on a tv before he joins the kids on that day and thinks pilot error (his words). He can't be talking about the 2nd one, because anyone who see's the 2nd plane hit, knows its not pilot error. Ergo he was watching some live secret feed that wasn't available to anybody else. How can that be explained away?
So in his own words....
-He watches the 1st plane hit on tv, thinks pilot error.
-Walks into the classroom, starts reading an upside down book.
-Gets whispered into the ear by the chief of staff informing of the 2nd one hitting.
-Stays there, finishes the talk with the kids and then pays attention to the attack afterwards.