Ex-CIA Pilot - No Planes Hit The Twin Towers


Status
Not open for further replies.
firstly. stop the name calling. Theres no need for it just because you have a differing opinion. Im not doing it to you.

the nursury ryhme version of events, as youve written

Okay then.

So, go through the bits I said, and state which bits you dont believe.

You seem to think its impossible for 19 blokes to take over planes and crash them yet believe the gov could swap planes, get rid of passengers, fire missiles and rig building with explosvives, all without anyone spilling the beans.
 
So you believe it was 15 middle eastern men who were not experts

Co-ordinated by a man who lived in a cave in afghan

Yes or No


How do you know this? why do you just accept this as fact?


15 middle eastern men didn't need to be "experts" to direct a plane at a target.

Bin Laden wasn't living in a cave, is there any evidence to support him ever living in a cave ?


Logon or register to see this image
 
I find it odd that you find what I said unbelievable, yet believe the gov swapped real planes with drone planes and fired a missile (and then had people plant bits of planes at the scene) and rigged the towers with explosives.

Ive never stated a drone was used. Jesus, @dangermows youre all over the place this morning, contracticing yourself left and right resorting to name calling to discredit other posters
 
I still cant work out what the CT's believe on here.

Some are saying the planes were flown by expert pilots. Okay, so who are these expert pilots being recruited and willing to kill themseleves and others for the gov? Also, if they are experts, how comes other pilots of planes in the area had tio take evasive action? Flight 175 almost collided with another plane (unless the air traffic controllers are in on it all as well? Actually they cant be cos, remember, they apparently thought the planes were military ;))

Others think they were remote controlled.

Others think they were missiles in fancy dress (how comes no one saw any missiles being launched, or making their way towards their targets?)
 
Ive never stated a drone was used. Jesus, @dangermows youre all over the place this morning, contracticing yourself left and right resorting to name calling to discredit other posters

Then I apologise (I get you and the other CT's mixed up - you all seem to have different theories).

Okay then, first up, just to clarify, what hit the twin towers in your opinion and what hit the pentagon in your opinion?
 
Once again, (and how many times have you been asked....?)

Explain it.

All of it...

In your words...

Ive got to go to f***ing work soon man, jesus. I said i will i havent got time now as its not a nursury ryhme length version of events
 
Once again, (and how many times have you been asked....?)

Explain it.

All of it...

In your words...

and anyway, why should i laid bare on this thread for the benefit of the 6 or 7 of you who are ready to stand and point - im not going to give yous the satisfaction

Like a pack of wild dogs man
 
Then I apologise (I get you and the other CT's mixed up - you all seem to have different theories).

Okay then, first up, just to clarify, what hit the twin towers in your opinion and what hit the pentagon in your opinion?

Youve got a few things mixed up this morning, ner mind though eh?
 
and anyway, why should i laid bare on this thread for the benefit of the 6 or 7 of you who are ready to stand and point - im not going to give yous the satisfaction

Like a pack of wild dogs man

Because not once has a conspiracy theorist been able to post an alternative version of events on here. They've always come up with an excuse not to (see above).

It's as if they know there isn't really a plausible alternative.
 
I've already said I found the lack off CCTV footage at the pentagon strange, so that's bullshit.

One man in a cave?

You want me to argue and debate yet your coming out with shit like that?

Exactly my point. He was portrayed as living in a cave was he not, fuks sake, shine a light mate

Because not once has a conspiracy theorist been able to post an alternative version of events on here. They've always come up with an excuse not to (see above).

It's as if they know there isn't really a plausible alternative.

Youre wrong mate
 
Exactly my point. He was portrayed as living in a cave was he not, fuks sake, shine a light mate



Youre wrong mate

Depends what you read. The stuff I have read on the people involved portrayed them a lot differently.

I would a detailed account of what you think has happened.
 
No. I'm not.

An alternative has never been posted.

There is not a plausible alternative.

You will not post a plausible alternative (you almost certainly will not post any alternative at all).

They will post alternatives, but they will not have a lepton of evidence which gives their 'theory' any credibility.
 
The use of CGI to fool us in to thinking planes hit the towers is the best yet, by far. That's the one CT claim I always chuckle at whenever I see it on video or read it.

No explanation at all on how this cgi footage was filmed simultaneously by different news agency's and witnesses and from a multitude of different angles - just it's cgi :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top