Ex-CIA Pilot - No Planes Hit The Twin Towers


Status
Not open for further replies.
19 blokes boarded different planes in teams of 4 and 5. They threatened air hostesses with knives to gain access to the cockpits. Once in they stabbed the pilots and took over the planes and 1 of each group (who had trained in flight schools - as clearly stated by instructors) flew them, very dangerously and irrationally, towards their targets. Three of the four hit.

It wasnt expensive, sophisticated or complex at all. It was simply exploiting a weakness in security.

Im not sure what is so hard to get.
 
I find the answer to a couple of things a bit dubious myself tbf, however, I draw the line though at drones, demolition, plane + passenger swaps, planting of evidence and cgi etc

The best writers in Hollywood couldn't come up with some of the shit I've read in this thread.

I tend to think it was a monumental failure from just about all branches of the security services: if the truth was then twisted slightly, it was to protect people within those services. That's wrong of them obviously but a lot different from actually planning and then executing it.

Yet you seem reluctant to argue them out on this thread
 
19 blokes boarded different planes in teams of 4 and 5. They threatened air hostesses with knives to gain access to the cockpits. Once in they stabbed the pilots and took over the planes and 1 of each group (who had trained in flight schools - as clearly stated by instructors) flew them, very dangerously and irrationally, towards their targets. Three of the four hit.

It wasnt expensive, sophisticated or complex at all. It was simply exploiting a weakness in security.

Im not sure what is so hard to get.

You should be working for the Bush Family Empire
 
Yet you seem reluctant to argue them out on this thread

Thats because people like you take one little thing that doesnt quite add up and run with it to say its all suss.

My stance is all the offical story is true. I also think the US ignored warnings of the attack and used the events to their future advantage.
 
You should be working for the Bush Family Empire

Rather than be a knacker, explain which of what I have said do you find unbelievable?

That 5 blokes could board a plane with box cutters (which were allowed at the time)?
That 5 blokes with knives could stab a couple of passengers and threaten air hostesses to gain access to the cockpit?
That a bloke who has been to flight school could fly a plane into a building?
That it wasnt expensive? (flight training and flight tickets being basically the only real costs)?
That it was sophisticated? (stab people, take over plane, crash it)?
That it was an exploitation of lapse security?
 
Thats because people like you take one little thing that doesnt quite add up and run with it to say its all suss.

My stance is all the offical story is true. I also think the US ignored warnings of the attack and used the events to their future advantage.

No people like you do that, you dont know whether youre coming or going here mate.

He said there were somd things from the official story didnt add up with him and i pointed out he should argue them in the thread

Seriously mate, slow down a bit man and read the thread properly
 
You should be working for the Bush Family Empire

I find it odd that you find what I said unbelievable, yet believe the gov swapped real planes with drone planes and fired a missile (and then had people plant bits of planes at the scene) and rigged the towers with explosives.
 
Rather than be a knacker, explain which of what I have said do you find unbelievable?

That 5 blokes could board a plane with box cutters (which were allowed at the time)?
That 5 blokes with knives could stab a couple of passengers and threaten air hostesses to gain access to the cockpit?
That a bloke who has been to flight school could fly a plane into a building?
That it wasnt expensive? (flight training and flight tickets being basically the only real costs)?
That it was sophisticated? (stab people, take over plane, crash it)?
That it was an exploitation of lapse security?

firstly. stop the name calling. Theres no need for it just because you have a differing opinion. Im not doing it to you.

the nursury ryhme version of events, as youve describled is plausable. if it comforts you to believe that thats fine. But that certainly is not what happened

You are familiar with the term 'patsy' arent you?
 
No people like you do that, you dont know whether youre coming or going here mate.

He said there were somd things from the official story didnt add up with him and i pointed out he should argue them in the thread

Seriously mate, slow down a bit man and read the thread properly

I am reading.

Ive told you, the lack of response to the possibility of the attacks is believable. But everything that happended in terms of the gov carrying out the actual attacks is ridiculous.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top