Ex-CIA Pilot - No Planes Hit The Twin Towers


Status
Not open for further replies.
So if they knew terrorists were about to do it why would the government do it?

Why hijack planes and slam a 'missile' into the pentagon if you have information saying someone else will do it for you :confused:

Exactly. The CT's always contradict themselves or argue against their own argument.

The US gove being aware of the threat and allowing it to happen is the only element of any 'cover up' I am willing to accept as possible.
 
Exactly. The CT's always contradict themselves or argue against their own argument.

The US gove being aware of the threat and allowing it to happen is the only element of any 'cover up' I am willing to accept as possible.

There are a couple of other small dubious bits around that day, but the overall scenario is as the 'official' version of events states.

Some people just need there to be a big conspiracy.
 
Exactly. The CT's always contradict themselves or argue against their own argument.

The US gove being aware of the threat and allowing it to happen is the only element of any 'cover up' I am willing to accept as possible.

I agree.

I still can't believe people think stuff was planted around the pentagon site, where the people planting evidence invisible?

Plenty of news crews / witnesses were on site immediately after the crash and as far as I'm aware nobody was spotted 'planting' anything.

If you had 200 people saying they'd seen a plane and 5 saying it was something else, the conspiracy theorists will always believe the 5...
 
I agree.

I still can't believe people think stuff was planted around the pentagon site, where the people planting evidence invisible?

Plenty of news crews / witnesses were on site immediately after the crash and as far as I'm aware nobody was spotted 'planting' anything.

If you had 200 people saying they'd seen a plane and 5 saying it was something else, the conspiracy theorists will always believe the 5...

If it was truly all an attack by the US on its own it would have done a better job of making sure no one doubted a thing and would have acted it out as most would expect.

- If Bush was in on it, he wouldnt have sat looking like a rabbit in the headlights at the school when he was informed.
- If they had planted explosives in the towers, they would have brought tower 1 down first, as that was the first to be hit.
- If they had used drone planes on the towers, (and got clear footage) they would have also done so at the pentagon (on both counts).

There are a couple of other small dubious bits around that day, but the overall scenario is as the 'official' version of events states.

Some people just need there to be a big conspiracy.

Difference is, where logical folk look at each piece and judge overall, the CT's find one bit that they sees as dubious and then run with it. The amount of 'nutters' that think the government would use drone planes on the towers, and then instead of using another drone plane on the pentagon, use a missile is absolutely laughable.
 
CTs, psychics, magic, homeopathy... somehow part of us is fascinated by the irrational and unscientific.
 
If it was truly all an attack by the US on its own it would have done a better job of making sure no one doubted a thing and would have acted it out as most would expect.

- If Bush was in on it, he wouldnt have sat looking like a rabbit in the headlights at the school when he was informed.
- If they had planted explosives in the towers, they would have brought tower 1 down first, as that was the first to be hit.
- If they had used drone planes on the towers, (and got clear footage) they would have also done so at the pentagon (on both counts).



Difference is, where logical folk look at each piece and judge overall, the CT's find one bit that they sees as dubious and then run with it. The amount of 'nutters' that think the government would use drone planes on the towers, and then instead of using another drone plane on the pentagon, use a missile is absolutely laughable.

I find the answer to a couple of things a bit dubious myself tbf, however, I draw the line though at drones, demolition, plane + passenger swaps, planting of evidence and cgi etc

The best writers in Hollywood couldn't come up with some of the shit I've read in this thread.

I tend to think it was a monumental failure from just about all branches of the security services: if the truth was then twisted slightly, it was to protect people within those services. That's wrong of them obviously but a lot different from actually planning and then executing it.
 
I find the answer to a couple of things a bit dubious myself tbf, however, I draw the line though at drones, demolition, plane + passenger swaps, planting of evidence and cgi etc

The best writers in Hollywood couldn't come up with some of the shit I've read in this thread.

I tend to think it was a monumental failure from just about all branches of the security services: if the truth was then twisted slightly, it was to protect people within those services. That's wrong of them obviously but a lot different from actually planning and then executing it.

Think this is bang on. Can't believe people actually buy into some of the conspiracies mentioned on this thread, truly mental.
 
I still can't believe the gov used planes to attack the towers but decided to use a missile on the pentagon :lol:

So the nutters reckon there was a document highlighting the fact Islamic extremists were going to use planes as flying bombs and the gov just copied the idea and did it themselves instead? :lol:

I was quoting @The Exile post who is pro the official story. See, calling prople nutters, who are brave enough to question something the dont believe is true and face ridicule, only weakens your own credibility
 
I was quoting @The Exile post who is pro the official story. See, calling prople nutters, who are brave enough to question something the dont believe is true and face ridicule, only weakens your own credibility

Trust me, in the context of this thread, that is definitely not something you're coming across as.
 
I find the answer to a couple of things a bit dubious myself tbf, however, I draw the line though at drones, demolition, plane + passenger swaps, planting of evidence and cgi etc

The best writers in Hollywood couldn't come up with some of the shit I've read in this thread.

I tend to think it was a monumental failure from just about all branches of the security services: if the truth was then twisted slightly, it was to protect people within those services. That's wrong of them obviously but a lot different from actually planning and then executing it.

Im leaning towards those in positions designed to protect America turned a blind eye.

Harsh but fair :lol:

Tea was flying all owa. Or perhaps there was no tea and it was all just CGI!?

I was quoting @The Exile post who is pro the official story. See, calling prople nutters, who are brave enough to question something the dont believe is true and face ridicule, only weakens your own credibility

No it doesnt. The actual physical happenings on the day, as 'officially' reported are fact. Those that doubt terrorists hijacked commercial planes and flew them into the three buildings are nutters in my eyes. Sorry like, but thats just the way it is.
 
Last edited:
So if they knew terrorists were about to do it why would the government do it?

Why hijack planes and slam a 'missile' into the pentagon if you have information saying someone else will do it for you :confused:

I was quoting @The Exile who said that. Obviously not reading the actual thread are you, just want to trip me up
 
One simple question, who on here truly believes the government hit the towers with drones planes and then hit pentagon with a missile?

I was quoting @The Exile who said that. Obviously not reading the actual thread are you, just want to trip me up

But we have seen the report stating the US had intelligence that planes were going to be hijacked. Its pushed by many of the '9/11 inside jobs' websites as reasons to hammer the US government.

I reckon those on here saying 9/11 was an inside job, also think the London bombings were too. Come on lads, prove me wrong :lol:
 
I find the answer to a couple of things a bit dubious myself tbf, however, I draw the line though at drones, demolition, plane + passenger swaps, planting of evidence and cgi etc

The best writers in Hollywood couldn't come up with some of the shit I've read in this thread.

I tend to think it was a monumental failure from just about all branches of the security services: if the truth was then twisted slightly, it was to protect people within those services. That's wrong of them obviously but a lot different from actually planning and then executing it.

So you believe it was 15 middle eastern men who were not experts

Co-ordinated by a man who lived in a cave in afghan

Yes or No

Trust me, in the context of this thread, that is definitely not something you're coming across as.

really. being ridiculed by about 6 or more
Im leaning towards those in positions designed to protect America turned a blind eye.



Tea was flying all owa. Or perhaps there was no tea and it was all just CGI!?



No it doesnt. The actual physical happenings on the day, as 'officially' reported are fact. Those that doubt terrorists hijacked commercial planes and flew them into the three buildings are nutters in my eyes. Sorry like, but thats just the way it is.

Well then your judgement has to be brought into question then. Because people with differing views to your own, whilst have a online chat, shouldnt be sectioned which is what most peoples opinion of what a nutter is.
 
Last edited:
We're still yet to see a coherent explanation as to how this was all done from any of the conspiracy theorists.
 
So you believe it was 15 middle eastern men who were not experts

Co-ordinated by a man who lived in a cave in afghan

Yes or No

I reckon I could deliver the orders from a cave like, or even another habitable environment such as porta-cabin or office. It would go like this:

"Book flights on four planes at a similar time and crash them into x,y & z. Any questions?"
 
I reckon I could deliver the orders from a cave like, or even another habitable environment such as porta-cabin or office. It would go like this:

"Book flights on four planes at a similar time and crash them into x,y & z. Any questions?"

Aye. Not exactly Hustle is it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top