Ex-CIA Pilot - No Planes Hit The Twin Towers


Status
Not open for further replies.
VAPORIZE. V_A_P_O_R_I_Z_E


DUTCH DEMOLITION EXPERT ™ (DECEASED)


ASSASSINATED


16FT HOLE



75FT HOLE


CRUISE MISSILE


FOOTPRINT


CESSNER LIGHT AIRCRAFT


ROLLS-ROYCE EMPLOYEE


Just catching up on the highlights.
 
I don't understand these conspiracy theorists. There is enough shit being pulled out in the open everyday to get angry about without looking for fantasies.
 
If the moral question is indeed one taken into consideration then why is there so much footage of the towers being hit with planes full of people who also die ?

Because it happened live on tv. The genie's out of the bottle at that point.
 
Check this shite out (had to be a mag :lol:)


I've seen it before, that bloke is arse twitchingly embarrassing.

"The ball that hit WTC2 was replaced in the footage, with a CGI'd aircraft that is GREY and typical of a computerised stock shot of an aircraft."

Logon or register to see this image


The actual plane to hit WTC2 in it's (as then) United Airlines livery....
Well what do you know, Richard? It's f***ing grey.

Ball,
BALL!! ffs :cry:
 
Any that there are of plane 1 hitting the tower are shown and available despite not being on live tv. The withholding of footage on moral grounds for the sake of the families of the victims at the Pentagon argument doesn't hold much water given that.
It's entirely different
 
In what way ?
Plane, crashing, footage, victims, families. Why would one be witheld on moral grounds and one not ?
One is military property, the other isn't. News agencies don't have any quibbles on broadcasting public material. Like the sky bloke poking around the wreckage in Ukraine
 
One is military property, the other isn't. News agencies don't have any quibbles on broadcasting public material. Like the sky bloke poking around the wreckage in Ukraine
I was thinking more along the lines of why the victims families who were on plane 1 are so different to the victims families who were on the plane that slammed into the Pentagon. Are you suggesting it's because the American Military have more morals ? :lol:
The Pentagon was/is covered wall to wall with surveillance and to think there is no definitive footage of what occurred is stretching things to unrealistic levels in my opinion. Surely all the cranks and conspiracists can be totally debunked and put to rest if footage is released of the Pentagon plane. To say it doesn't exist is nonsense in my honest opinion.
 
I was thinking more along the lines of why the victims families who were on plane 1 are so different to the victims families who were on the plane that slammed into the Pentagon. Are you suggesting it's because the American Military have more morals ? :lol:
The Pentagon was/is covered wall to wall with surveillance and to think there is no definitive footage of what occurred is stretching things to unrealistic levels in my opinion. Surely all the cranks and conspiracists can be totally debunked and put to rest if footage is released of the Pentagon plane. To say it doesn't exist is nonsense in my honest opinion.
No I'm suggesting the pentagon has no obligation or need to release the videos into the public domain. Whereas some french bloke's grainy vhs us already in the public domain.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top