Occam's Razor
Striker
They may (or may not) have seen a seat with floor attached.
Who is to say it was not placed for them to see?
Why on earth would wreckage be placed to be found if it directly disproved what they were trying to prove?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They may (or may not) have seen a seat with floor attached.
Who is to say it was not placed for them to see?
They may (or may not) have seen a seat with floor attached.
Who is to say it was not placed for them to see?
I cannot imagine a plane hitting the pentagon head on, and a good sized chunk of the cockpit remaining intact, specially something as fragile as a seat - when it was supposed to have created a 16 foot hole in the wall.
The cock pit took the brunt of the impact, if it survived then far more of the plane would have survived intact.
Anyone who seriously doubts that it was an American Airlines Boeing 757 which flew into the Pentagon should really spend a few minutes reading these eyewitness accounts (all of them named, all of them sourced, and on a website which tends to be sympathetic to CTs) and explain to the rest of us exactly what it was that all of them were seeing independently.
So you do really think they risked the whole plot by using a missile despite successfully using plane on the towers. Tremendous![]()
The seat was planted? Seriously? You think that?
how else could they cause the damage to the pentagon building?
To be honest mate, I do not know what to believe when it comes to 9/11. There is so much conflicting information it is unbelievable, one mans expert is another mans nutter and vice versa.its pointless man, the official version of events story has been enough for them to not to see the elephant in the room.
How do you know the FBI took them?
a statement by joel velasquez, GITGO gas station employee, to national geographic, the following day
I've laid my cards on the table if you read the thread
I reckon the way the terrorists did, with a plane!
Haway marra, I keep being told the bit of the pentagon that got hit was weakened as part of the inside job.
Chief Master Sergeant John Monaccio, the senior Air Force enlisted police officer for the Air Force: "I was in the Pentagon on Sep 11th, in room 1B461, when we were attacked. I personally participated in rescue and recovery operations [...] The plane's inertia carried aircraft remains all the way through the building coming to rest on the outside walls of our offices. We discovered cockpit wreckage at our feet while attempting to rescue people from a Navy operations area."
http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/pentagon-email_20020316.html
Loads of weird things happen in plane crashes, unlikely things survive wreckage all the time.
Why on earth would wreckage be placed to be found if it directly disproved what they were trying to prove?
A cruise missile?
Jesus wept. The government must be worried sick with all these columbos on the case.
Why on earth would wreckage be placed to be found if it directly disproved what they were trying to prove?
A cruise missile?
Jesus wept. The government must be worried sick with all these columbos on the case.
It really does seem like a 21st century religion.
just the hardly no wreckage, only a 16ft hole and the cctv consfication, kind of doesn't support that though does it
a vaporised airliner, you'll be telling me you believe the magic bullit theory in the JFK assignation next!
Yes the people not to placate a small number of conspiracy theorists.its the dod - and why shouldn't they, governments are supposed to be transparent and servant to the people
don't you think it would shut everyone up? footage was confiscated from the gas stain and hotel which would clear the whole thing up
instead they release a 5 frame clip from a side angle which actually clearly doesn't show an airliner whatsoever, not unless it invisible
The seat was planted? Seriously? You think that?