Every conspiracy theory is discounted by the know it alls on the SMB - it's a wonder the bible has been discredited on here, afterall it is written down
So what happened then?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Every conspiracy theory is discounted by the know it alls on the SMB - it's a wonder the bible has been discredited on here, afterall it is written down
See aboveSo what happened then?
So you don't believe some radged up Muslims did it.I'm currently at work, but to be short, I have no firm opinion what happened on the day / who was responsible.
I have an open mind to criticism of all arguments (including the OP)
I'm currently at work, but to be short, I have no firm opinion what happened on the day / who was responsible.
I have an open mind to criticism of all arguments (including the OP)
There are many versions of events which have been put forward, many have major flaws and can be completely discredited. All of the versions of events have inconsistencies to an extent and points of interest which are reasonable for discussion.That's the problem. It's easy to try to find small inconsistencies in the evidence and you're more likely to find them if you're basing conclusions on a limited understanding of the underlying science (Professional Mackem is the master of this). However, as it stands there is only one series of events that has been put forward to explain what happened that day. Until there is a credible alternative to explain everything and not just some perceived flaw in the evidence there's no reason to suppose the 'official' version of events isn't what happened.
There are many versions of events which have been put forward, many have major flaws and can be completely discredited. All of the versions of events have inconsistencies to an extent and points of interest which are reasonable for discussion.
For example, if I took the version of events as stated by the USA as the truth and , as @Tadger puts it, radged up Muslims were responsible - does that mean we shouldn't question who knew what afterwards? Or if the attacks could have been prevented but were instead allowed to happen?
Everything should be questioned.
What does he think they were, if not planes? Helicopters? Trams?
What does he think they were, if not planes? Helicopters? Trams?
So says ex-CIA pilot John Lear.
http://neonnettle.com/news/211-ex-cia-pilot-gives-sworn-testimony-that-no-planes-hit-the-twin-towers
Everything should be questioned.
Ah, the default fall-back argument of the conspiracy theorist. Almost always used by people who steadfastly refuse to believe in things for which there is an overwhelming amount of evidence yet post, apparently without having paused to question any of it, the deranged ramblings of discredited fantasists under unequivocal and declamatory thread titles.
I cannot conceive the mind of a person that buys into this bullshit. Have they nowt better to do?
I could give a sworn testimony that today is Thursday, doesn't make it true.
tiptoad - I've seen on here before that you are a bulldog when it comes to debate and by bringing such a ludicrous comparison into the fray I am afraid I can no longer respond to you on this threadAnd yet you feel no inclination to question a claim made by someone who also believes that the moon was towed into its orbit around earth by aliens from Venus, with whom he's in regular contact.
You'll find I haven't offered any opinion at all on the issue, so back tracking isn't possible. You've simply not had the rise you wanted from asking me to explain what happenedEven the OP's backtracked to 'it probably was terrorists but what if the US government knew about it' now.