Ex-CIA Pilot - No Planes Hit The Twin Towers


Status
Not open for further replies.
Some other things John Lear believes.

There's a city on the moon called Endymion.
That Albert Einstein was a hoax.
That the Pope knows where the aliens are.
That an alien attended the Pope's funeral.
That some gravity went missing in Canada.
That there's a secret submarine base under the Nevada desert.
That there is a structure on the moon that predates but is identical the Burj Khalifa. This structure captures people's souls.

Thought it might be worth quoting this, just in case people are accidentally believing the type of absolute fuckwits who peddle conspiracy theories.
 
Thought it might be worth quoting this, just in case people are accidentally believing the type of absolute fuckwits who peddle conspiracy theories.

It seems to have got worse, there are loads of new tin-foil aficionados it seems. I miss the days when it was just PM who believed all this rubbish.
 
It seems to have got worse, there are loads of new tin-foil aficionados it seems. I miss the days when it was just PM who believed all this rubbish.

People like to think they have the inside track, even if that means believing in absolute shit.

It's the new religion. Fairy stories for idiots to congregate around.
 

You said it.

couple of questions/ observations regarding those pics.

why were these released 2006 when all the other news outlets who were on the scene never once showed them.

why do the photos contradict the official narrative? Where it says the plane went that fast in the hole that it submerged itself.

Why are those pics not in the area the plane came down?

Where are the big bits like engine etc? That we normally see at other crash sites.

the top two photos look like someone just placed bits on the grass.
 
You said it.

couple of questions/ observations regarding those pics.

why were these released 2006 when all the other news outlets who were on the scene never once showed them.

why do the photos contradict the official narrative? Where it says the plane went that fast in the hole that it submerged itself.

Why are those pics not in the area the plane came down?

Where are the big bits like engine etc? That we normally see at other crash sites.

the top two photos look like someone just placed bits on the grass.

going to have a guess and say the crash site was sealed off as a crime scene and the bits taken away for forensic testing pretty sharpish. that's what I'd do and I'm far from a crash investigator. especially if it was part of the biggest terrorist attack my country had ever seen.
 
You said it.

couple of questions/ observations regarding those pics.

why were these released 2006 when all the other news outlets who were on the scene never once showed them.

why do the photos contradict the official narrative? Where it says the plane went that fast in the hole that it submerged itself.

Why are those pics not in the area the plane came down?

Where are the big bits like engine etc? That we normally see at other crash sites.

the top two photos look like someone just placed bits on the grass.

:lol:

Mate - your version of events has far more holes in it. Why do you believe it? Why are you only willing to apply critical thinking to what other people believe?

Is it because you just want to belong? Because let's face it, it's nothing whatsoever to do with truth.
 
:lol:

Why the vitriol? Can't it be that more people are waking up to the constant lies and mis truths that we are forced to endure on a daily basis.

Can you remember that time you believed in "Special Moon Water" cos you read it on one of your special websites? And it was pointed out that it was a big load of old bollocks? And you accepted it?

Why aren't you angry at that lie?
 
:lol:

Why the vitriol? Can't it be that more people are waking up to the constant lies and mis truths that we are forced to endure on a daily basis.

Don't get me wrong, these threads can be very entertaining, special moon water was a classic.

It just gets a bit repetitive when new people pop up spouting the same nonsense that's been debunked several times in the numerous previous threads on the subject.[DOUBLEPOST=1394642552][/DOUBLEPOST]
I don't think there is. I for one don't think the US government were complicit.

What do you think happened then?
 
There are plenty of people on this thread that think the US did attack their own citizens though.
I suppose that's the beauty of a conspiracy, to keep people guessing. For people to naively assume the government weren't aware of this plot, allows the people who 'allowed' this to happen, to get away with it. As a result of ridiculous theories such as hologram planes hitting the twin towers, any 'theory' behind 9/11 is instantly rubbished - generally because the word conspiracy is implied, people conspire every day, politicians every minute of every day.[DOUBLEPOST=1394643188][/DOUBLEPOST]
People like to think they have the inside track, even if that means believing in absolute shit.

It's the new religion. Fairy stories for idiots to congregate around.

Isn't that, arguably, the basis of religion?
 
Last edited:
Isn't that, arguably, the basis of religion?

Arguably.

I'm firmly of the belief that the popularity of CTs is directly related to the decline of religion. Some people have an innate need to believe in something bigger than themselves - even if it's a load of shite.
 
going to have a guess and say the crash site was sealed off as a crime scene and the bits taken away for forensic testing pretty sharpish. that's what I'd do and I'm far from a crash investigator. especially if it was part of the biggest terrorist attack my country had ever seen.

Which is fair play. However the crash sit was on public display and photographed numerous times. The items on these photos were never in them.

Nearly 100% on the people on the scene including police/ journalists commented on the fact that it didn't feel like a plane crash as there was no sign of any plane.[DOUBLEPOST=1394644603][/DOUBLEPOST]
:lol:

Mate - your version of events has far more holes in it. Why do you believe it? Why are you only willing to apply critical thinking to what other people believe?

Is it because you just want to belong? Because let's face it, it's nothing whatsoever to do with truth.

Belong? Haway man I'm not a spotty teenager. I am a family man with a close circle of friends, both of which I don't pester with all this stuff. I don't need to belong or have a inside track as another poster said. I just like questioning things and not simply eat everything that is spoon fed to us.

That's the thing I have no version, I don't say I know everything. What I do know there are so many things that just don't add up about that day.
 
Last edited:
Which is fair play. However the crash sit was on public display and photographed numerous times. The items on these photos were never in them.

Nearly 100% on the people on the scene including police/ journalists commented on the fact that it didn't feel like a plane crash as there was no sign of any plane.[DOUBLEPOST=1394644603][/DOUBLEPOST]

Belong? Haway man I'm not a spotty teenager. I am a family man with a close circle of friends, both of which I don't pester with all this stuff. I don't need to belong or have a inside track as another poster said. I just like questioning things and not simply eat everything that is spoon fed to us.

That's the thing I have no version, I don't say I know everything. What I do know there are so many things that just don't add up about that day.
what was the hole in the ground caused by then? it's more than a missile crater that's for sure
 
Which is fair play. However the crash sit was on public display and photographed numerous times. The items on these photos were never in them.

Nearly 100% on the people on the scene including police/ journalists commented on the fact that it didn't feel like a plane crash as there was no sign of any plane.[DOUBLEPOST=1394644603][/DOUBLEPOST]

Belong? Haway man I'm not a spotty teenager. I am a family man with a close circle of friends, both of which I don't pester with all this stuff. I don't need to belong or have a inside track as another poster said. I just like questioning things and not simply eat everything that is spoon fed to us.

That's the thing I have no version, I don't say I know everything. What I do know there are so many things that just don't add up about that day.

It does add up, in as much as anything can outside of a petri dish.

A plane crashed. That correlates with a plane-shaped hole in the deck, plane debris around the hole, eye witness testimony, audio recording, black box data and a missing plane.

What you have is a bunch of idiots talking 2+2=5 bollocks. It's very revealing that you but great stick in their hearsay while completely dismissing the overwhelming body of evidence.

You only apply a high burden of proof when it comes to the official version of anything, and yet are happy to entertain the most fluffy of stuff that supports counter theories. Have you ever asked yourself why that's so?
 
Can you remember that time you believed in "Special Moon Water" cos you read it on one of your special websites? And it was pointed out that it was a big load of old bollocks? And you accepted it?

Why aren't you angry at that lie?

No comment. :lol: That is for another day. For the record I have never said I accepted anything.

Regarding Special moon water, it has been taken out of context. The question was why should be be back to the moon as it wouldn't be economically viable. My answer was that future fuel cells will be able to extract the hydrogen as there is are types of water on the moon that have a higher percentage of hydrogen which can be extracted.
 
It seems to have got worse, there are loads of new tin-foil aficionados it seems. I miss the days when it was just PM who believed all this rubbish.
UFOs are Real though.:)[DOUBLEPOST=1394645083][/DOUBLEPOST]
No comment. :lol: That is for another day. For the record I have never said I accepted anything.

Regarding Special moon water, it has been taken out of context. The question was why should be be back to the moon as it wouldn't be economically viable. My answer was that future fuel cells will be able to extract the hydrogen as there is are types of water on the moon that have a higher percentage of hydrogen which can be extracted.
:lol:Reading this bit just made me burst out laughing:lol:;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top