Ex-CIA Pilot - No Planes Hit The Twin Towers


Status
Not open for further replies.
hmmm. I assume drug means dragged - yet I cannot see a single sign of any wing being dug into the ground just before the aircraft hit the building at however many hundreds of miles an hour.
Doesnt look like a blade of grass was damaged in fact.
Plus, for one wing to dig into the ground the aircraft would have to be much higher up than it was, it hit virtually at ground level.

Well, he was there. You on the other hand, are just someone on the internet. So of course you're right.
 
hmmm. I assume drug means dragged - yet I cannot see a single sign of any wing being dug into the ground just before the aircraft hit the building at however many hundreds of miles an hour.
Doesnt look like a blade of grass was damaged in fact.
Plus, for one wing to dig into the ground the aircraft would have to be much higher up than it was, it hit virtually at ground level.

Jesus christ.
 
hmmm. I assume drug means dragged - yet I cannot see a single sign of any wing being dug into the ground just before the aircraft hit the building at however many hundreds of miles an hour.
Doesnt look like a blade of grass was damaged in fact.
Plus, for one wing to dig into the ground the aircraft would have to be much higher up than it was, it hit virtually at ground level.
Wow. Just wow[DOUBLEPOST=1394482952][/DOUBLEPOST]Any of the nay sayers want to give a plausible alternative to what happened? Again phone number available of my mate who watched plane 2 hit the building. Or indeed my boss who explained that his NY office had lost contact with >200 staff.

Please.
 
Last edited:
I reckon the planes were there for the theatre , the shock and awe visuals if you will - but something else brought down the towers - I mean as I have said before in this thread , the towers turned to dust in mid air , and left hardly any debris on the ground

dr judy wood`s book where did the towers go puts forward the theory that a directed energy weapon brought the towers down and turned them to dust mid air
 
I reckon the planes were there for the theatre , the shock and awe visuals if you will - but something else brought down the towers - I mean as I have said before in this thread , the towers turned to dust in mid air , and left hardly any debris on the ground

dr judy wood`s book where did the towers go puts forward the theory that a directed energy weapon brought the towers down and turned them to dust mid air
I'm sorry, but I really cant tell if this is a whoosh attempt or serious :eek:
 
I reckon the planes were there for the theatre , the shock and awe visuals if you will - but something else brought down the towers - I mean as I have said before in this thread , the towers turned to dust in mid air , and left hardly any debris on the ground

dr judy wood`s book where did the towers go puts forward the theory that a directed energy weapon brought the towers down and turned them to dust mid air
Logon or register to see this image
 
Wow. Just wow[DOUBLEPOST=1394482952][/DOUBLEPOST]Any of the nay sayers want to give a plausible alternative to what happened? Again phone number available of my mate who watched plane 2 hit the building. Or indeed my boss who explained that his NY office had lost contact with >200 staff.

Please.

Im at a loss as what your mates testimony about an attack that happened god knows how many (hundreds?) of miles away has to do with the attack on the pentagon.

There is footage of planes hitting the towers, none available for the pentagon yet (other than a 1 or two frame blurry could be anything really bit of footage).

If you look at the pics of the pentagon crash site, where is the massive gouge in the grass just before the pentagon? There should be one according to his testimony, in fact, if the plane had hit wing first into the ground, surely it would have flip/broke up before hitting the pentagon...
It didnt, according to official story it went straight in, at ground level - again meaning one wing could not have gouged the ground as the wingspan is so large it would have to be WAY higher for it to tilt enough for one wing to hit.
 
Any pilots on the forum?
How hard is it to point an already flying plane at a large landmark?
Assuming you dont care one bit about landing safely, or damage to the aircraft - is it really that hard to aim an already flying plane at something?
 
Any pilots on the forum?
How hard is it to point an already flying plane at a large landmark?
Assuming you dont care one bit about landing safely, or damage to the aircraft - is it really that hard to aim an already flying plane at something?
There's at least one on this thread.
 
I reckon the planes were there for the theatre , the shock and awe visuals if you will - but something else brought down the towers - I mean as I have said before in this thread , the towers turned to dust in mid air , and left hardly any debris on the ground

dr judy wood`s book where did the towers go puts forward the theory that a directed energy weapon brought the towers down and turned them to dust mid air
:lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Any pilots on the forum?
How hard is it to point an already flying plane at a large landmark?
Assuming you dont care one bit about landing safely, or damage to the aircraft - is it really that hard to aim an already flying plane at something?
Piece of piss...
 
Any pilots on the forum?
How hard is it to point an already flying plane at a large landmark?
Assuming you dont care one bit about landing safely, or damage to the aircraft - is it really that hard to aim an already flying plane at something?
Yep, Hillview Aviator and I believe The Exile works in air traffic control?

Both are not on the conspiracy theorists 'side' if I am not mistaken
 
hey you can scoff at me as much as you want - you all believe 2 planes knocked down 3 towers - ha ha suckers:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top