red and white pantalooms
Winger
was the reviewer blind or what ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Typos galore in that article, I take it they don't employ proof readers?
My favourite mistakes are that Hull's "kids shirts will feature the logo of new partner World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) on the shorts", and Leeds use of "old" rather than the usual yellow and blue.
Anybody else noticed that they criticise the Ipswich kit, then praise the Birmingham one which uses exactly the same template?
I don't think so. Did you read the next line?Does it not just mean "you may not like Sunderland" as in "you may not support Sunderland"???
Why wouldn't Birmingham fans like you?
Unless they mean Villa fans? but then, why would Villa fans dislike you? I know they hate us, but surely that would mean they'd have a soft spot for you?
Nobody likes us, we don't care.Wonder why the Birmingham Mail assumes their readers may not like us
Actually looking at those ours is the only one that is a little different to the norm, they are all pretty boring tbh, though I do quite like Sheffield united's despite all the black.Ours is absolute dross
"You may not like Sunderland"
C*nts
That's the problem, from a distance we're seeing pink tops.Yes, they slag templates then put some near the top, they hate plain and love plain. I thought our stripes were getting too broad, but we've gone too far the other way IMO - from a distance it's barely stripes at all. Brentfords may be boring, but it's our strip. The Sheffield United one wouldn't work for us - way too much black. The plain back is a red herring of course due to league rules, but still don't like it. I don't even like the badge, wtf with the black outline, if you had to have one it should have been red. I'm going to skip this one, judging by pre-season it's not going to be a heavy seller. Maybe's the away one for me...