Don’t appoint anybody (‘no’ manager suggestion)


Given the shambolic list of potential candidates the bookies seem to have us linked with plus reading some of the suggestions on here leads me to believe we might be better off appointing nobody and letting the team pick themselves on a permanent basis.

To start with the positives, we’d save a tidy bundle on wages and eventual severance package which would contribute to KLD’s vision of us becoming self-sustainable, plus Speakman would have nobody to fall out with when it comes to interference in team selections and transfer policy.

The negatives being they’d have nobody to sack to take the heat off their mistakes when it eventually turns to shit.

Thoughts?
Long overdue, lets be the St Pauli of the UK and have an anarchistic collective of unionised players make all the big calls.
 
Given the shambolic list of potential candidates the bookies seem to have us linked with plus reading some of the suggestions on here leads me to believe we might be better off appointing nobody and letting the team pick themselves on a permanent basis.

To start with the positives, we’d save a tidy bundle on wages and eventual severance package which would contribute to KLD’s vision of us becoming self-sustainable, plus Speakman would have nobody to fall out with when it comes to interference in team selections and transfer policy.

The negatives being they’d have nobody to sack to take the heat off their mistakes when it eventually turns to shit.

Thoughts?

Make Luke player manager, that will sort it
 
Given the shambolic list of potential candidates the bookies seem to have us linked with plus reading some of the suggestions on here leads me to believe we might be better off appointing nobody and letting the team pick themselves on a permanent basis.

To start with the positives, we’d save a tidy bundle on wages and eventual severance package which would contribute to KLD’s vision of us becoming self-sustainable, plus Speakman would have nobody to fall out with when it comes to interference in team selections and transfer policy.

The negatives being they’d have nobody to sack to take the heat off their mistakes when it eventually turns to shit.

Thoughts?
What about creating a new reality TV show called "The Pick of the Pundits" and have all these so called expert pundits pick the team for the games. The pundit with the least number of losses avoids a kicking.
 
After a thorough search and many hours put in to finding a successor to Mr Mowbray, the owner group have come to the conclusion that Mike Dodds and Mark Proctor are the perfect fit for the model
 
We should just let Dave Jones pick the side considering his knowledge from the punditry team on sky sports and let the chuckle brothers continue coaching in training
 
Given the shambolic list of potential candidates the bookies seem to have us linked with plus reading some of the suggestions on here leads me to believe we might be better off appointing nobody and letting the team pick themselves on a permanent basis.

To start with the positives, we’d save a tidy bundle on wages and eventual severance package which would contribute to KLD’s vision of us becoming self-sustainable, plus Speakman would have nobody to fall out with when it comes to interference in team selections and transfer policy.

The negatives being they’d have nobody to sack to take the heat off their mistakes when it eventually turns to shit.

Thoughts?
how about no
 
Last edited:

Back
Top