Father Jack Hackett
Striker
I’ll file this one under: ‘commenting on something he knows nothing about’I don't know, I didn't even know you were playing early.
Without having seen it I feel confident that the referee acted in good faith as I don't think referees are corrupt.
Perhaps your player was consistently showing dissent so the final act in your eyes may not feel sufficient to warrant a card, but like players who commit lots of niggly fouls, the referee said enough is enough and gave him a card that he deserved. You have to be a bit of a bonehead to get a second card in a game so your anger and disappointment really needs to go to the player, not the ref and not anyone who disagrees with your view.
Ta