Father Jack Hackett
Striker
What grief did he give him? Tell us what he saidEveryone wants to see the refs get less grief and more respect until the consequences come home to roost.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What grief did he give him? Tell us what he saidEveryone wants to see the refs get less grief and more respect until the consequences come home to roost.
Marched halfway across the pitch to do it, whilst already on a yellow.For saying “that’s not a f***ing foul”?
Where is the abuse or dissent there?Marched halfway across the pitch to do it, whilst already on a yellow.
Play silly games and win silly prizes.
What are you expecting exactly?So dissent is whatever the referee says it is? Doesn’t need to be swearing. Doesn’t need to be disagreeing. It’s defined by the ref?
Where is the abuse or dissent there?
How many booking should we see every single game then? Corburn was throwing his arms about and whingeing throughout, Greenwood booted the ball away. All that ok, aye?So the ref booked him for nowt?
The ref was shite, but fairly sure he didn’t book him for the way he was walking.
For saying “that’s not a f***ing foul”?
How often is that a yellow card?Yes. For that.
Maybe an enforced substitution for dissent but a sending off ruins the game.Red card for dissent ruins the game without anyone being hurt. Should be a hefty fine, not a red. Happens all the time with players hollering in the ref's face with no action taken, often ref just laughs it off.
Ref should be more bothered about booking players for pulling back and kicking the ball away.
AgreeAye. The lads just showed he’s got a bit to learn.
It’s the fact not one boro player got booked for it and throwing the ball away. Inconsistency is the problem here.Blamethe ref all we like, Dan Neil should not have put himself in a position to let the ref be a c*nt
So where would we have to take our foal kick frin¿They should have stuck with the rule where dissent gets you marched back 10 yards
You don't know that's all he said.He said "that was a f***ing foul ref". The game was ruined for that. Pathetic.
No….they get a yellow card sometimes and therein lies the problem.Disagree. Dissent is on the rise and needs stamping out. Players know the rules. If they mouth off they get a yellow card.
Didn’t get a red card for dissent, he got a yellow card, which was his second, therefore sent off !Red card for dissent ruins the game without anyone being hurt. Should be a hefty fine, not a red. Happens all the time with players hollering in the ref's face with no action taken, often ref just laughs it off.
Ref should be more bothered about booking players for pulling back and kicking the ball away.
What are the guidelines exactly?
I’m saying that “it’s a f***ing foul” is soft. Thousands of players will have said it before and not got a card.What are you expecting exactly?
Yes, the ref has to make a judgement in the same way a teacher or employee will have to make a judgement about the actions or behaviours of students or employees.
As a boss, nobody gave me an exhaustive list of every word or action someone can or cannot make. It would be impossible. I have to use judgement and be confident I apply that correctly.
You cannot cover every possible permutation of what could be said or how it could be said. That is why both the rugby and football rules cover examples of disrespect e.g. sarcastic clapping or certain words and phrases in the rugby rules (I won't repeat the rugby examples published).