Which one of those definitions of dissent does telling the he thought it was a foul fall into?Well suppose telling the ref it was a foul when he thought is wasn’t.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which one of those definitions of dissent does telling the he thought it was a foul fall into?Well suppose telling the ref it was a foul when he thought is wasn’t.
When 'boro player approach the ref to protest the yellow given for tripping Ba on 31' and none are carded, would it not be safe to assume that the ref isn't going to send you off for doing the same?
I think the second yellow was for entertaining the field of play without a brainRed card for dissent ruins the game without anyone being hurt. Should be a hefty fine, not a red. Happens all the time with players hollering in the ref's face with no action taken, often ref just laughs it off.
Ref should be more bothered about booking players for pulling back and kicking the ball away.
Very rare for a ref to issue a second yellow for dissent when a player could go off. However Dan Neil was on a yellow , so he should have kept his mouth shut, he has cost us big style today.
Well yes, but why aren't protesting 'boro players carded on 31' minute? To fail there to impose the law and then send off a player enforcing it is bonkers decision making by the ref.Dealing with dissent
Dissent Law 12 (Fouls & misconduct ) states: “A player is cautioned and shown the yellow card if he commits an offence of dissent by word or action”. Furthermore, advice/guidance offered in the Laws states: “A player who is guilty of dissent by protesting (verbally or non-verbally) against a...yorkreferee.co.uk
Referee skipped about seven steps in dealing with it.
He was lucky he didn't connect with his studs up, but he can't be lucky not getting a red for that tackle because you can't be sent off for a tackle that doesn't connect and when players are it is always rescinded on appeal.When will footballers start thinking before they mouth off, and start respecting the ref more, like they do in rugby. They really bring it on themselves at times . Gutted at the result but it was bloody stupid from Neil when he already must have known that he was lucky to have only got a yellow rather than a red for his first offence.
Absolutely.Well yes, but why aren't protesting 'boro players carded on 31' minute? To fail there to impose the law and then send off a player enforcing it is bonkers decision making by the ref.
He was lucky he didn't connect with his studs up, but he can't be lucky not getting a red for that tackle because you can't be sent off for a tackle that doesn't connect.
This. Anyone who swears at the ref should be booked but it's the inconsistency that's annoying. Most of the time players get away with it cos the refs bottle booking them. It would soon stop if every player was booked for it.A yellow for dissent is probably right, the problem is referees deciding to book some players and not others, the pressure a footballer is under every game there's just know way they won't lose their mind when refs consistently make bad decisions which is what's got Dan Neil sent off, Neil needs to control himself but players are not robots and they boil over especially when they can see really obvious stuff getting missed.
Caution offences include (but are not limited to):Which one of those definitions of dissent does telling the he thought it was a foul fall into?
So dissent is whatever the referee says it is? Doesn’t need to be swearing. Doesn’t need to be disagreeing. It’s defined by the ref?Caution offences include (but are not limited to):
Doesn’t really have to be one of those. But by word or action surely.
Seems that way. I’m sure they let swearing go but add in context, aggression etc….So dissent is whatever the referee says it is? Doesn’t need to be swearing. Doesn’t need to be disagreeing. It’s defined by the ref?
If one of their players had been sent off for the same reason would you have created this thread ?Red card for dissent ruins the game without anyone being hurt. Should be a hefty fine, not a red. Happens all the time with players hollering in the ref's face with no action taken, often ref just laughs it off.
Ref should be more bothered about booking players for pulling back and kicking the ball away.
When will footballers start thinking before they mouth off, and start respecting the ref more, like they do in rugby. They really bring it on themselves at times . Gutted at the result but it was bloody stupid from Neil when he already must have known that he was lucky to have only got a yellow rather than a red for his first offence.
For saying “that’s not a f***ing foul”?Dan Neil’s fault. Absolute moron.
Aye. The lads just showed he’s got a bit to learn.That legbreaker could've been a red, woz lucky to be on the pitch in first place then just stupid moaning at ref !