BumbleBee
Striker
Seems to be a bit early in the window to agree to a loan of an experienced player. Surely we would only agree to this later on?
Must be desperate to get rid then.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seems to be a bit early in the window to agree to a loan of an experienced player. Surely we would only agree to this later on?
Must be desperate to get rid then.
They were going to be forking out 4.3 million on Charlie Austin, unproven in the Premier League. I would be looking for all of that and another million or so if they stay up.
They have a weak hand.
Hope it's a permanent deal but at least if it's a loan the bugger can't score against us (I know he's shite but he'd be bound to, wouldnt he?)
As someone said maybe there is a fee. Maybe they are paying all of his wages. Maybe they know that nobody but Bruce would want the useless knacker.
Graham won't agree to it though. If he signs permanent and they go down probably a clause he takes c50% pay cut. What if they go down and another EPL club doesn't come in for him? Think loan is best we can hope for.
Jarvis, Pepe and Nathan Gunn wanted him. Nuff said.
He will have the clause in his contract with us
Would bank on Hull going down before us though - would you not?
He will have the clause in his contract with us
Exalted company there mind
I didn't, I have nothing against him personally and think he is ok but not the type of striker we needed, we needed pace. I thought it was a strange one. Feel free to check.
He will have the clause in his contract with us
Would bank on Hull going down before us though - would you not?
I wouldn't bank on anything.
People thought we would finish a comfortable mid table last year.
He will have the clause in his contract with us
Exalted company there mind
I didn't, I have nothing against him personally and think he is ok but not the type of striker we needed, we needed pace. I thought it was a strange one. Feel free to check.
The poll says otherwise.
This.I think Graham is a decent player, and apart from the lack of goals he's been half decent holding the line for us... however he was the wrong player with what we needed at the time, and still do need. Odd signing from MON
Good luck to the lad, he's given us 100%
I think Graham is a decent player, and apart from the lack of goals he's been half decent holding the line for us... however he was the wrong player with what we needed at the time, and still do need. Odd signing from MON
Good luck to the lad, he's given us 100%
I wouldn't bank on anything.
People thought we would finish a comfortable mid table last year.
Us or Hull though - which one most likely? Remember Danny's got £40k per week riding on this - put yourself in his shoes - us or Hull most likely to go?
Us or Hull though - which one most likely? Remember Danny's got £40k per week riding on this - put yourself in his shoes - us or Hull most likely to go?
I would be amazed if he is on anywhere near 40k a week, amazed.
I think Graham is a decent player, and apart from the lack of goals he's been half decent holding the line for us... however he was the wrong player with what we needed at the time, and still do need. Odd signing from MON
Good luck to the lad, he's given us 100%
I disagree. I do not believe he gave us 100% against Villa, Southampton and Stoke. I thought he looked poor with few strengths to his game.