Cops son avoids jail for drug driving twice


The whole article doesn’t make very good reading. He was absolved of blame for the first incident for some reason.

Second for dealing.

Third for refusing a sample and still walks free.
 
I absolutely doubt it. A sergeant would have absolutely zero pull whatsoever with interfering with the justice system. Just another non story to inflate the anti police rhetoric that’s already got plenty traction at present.
So you dont think things like this are a reason for the anti- police rhetoric ?, i would honestly expect any young lad having been caught drug driving twice and dealing to expect some porridge, perhaps they are waiting until he ploughs into someone else while off his face 1st.
 
So you dont think things like this are a reason for the anti- police rhetoric ?, i would honestly expect any young lad having been caught drug driving twice and dealing to expect some porridge, perhaps they are waiting until he ploughs into someone else while off his face 1st.
But what’s it got to do with his fatha? If he’s had absolutely no involvement in the case and no influence in the outcome (which is highly likely) then his dads job is completely irrelevant here. No reason to even mention his dads job apart from to trigger anti police sentiments which has had the desired effect in your case .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
But what’s it got to do with his fatha? If he’s had absolutely no involvement in the case and no influence in the outcome (which is highly likely) then his dads job is completely irrelevant here. No reason to even mention his dads job apart from to trigger anti police sentiments which has had the desired effect in your case .
It was the article that mentioned both his mam and dads profession.
 
But what’s it got to do with his fatha? If he’s had absolutely no involvement in the case and no influence in the outcome (which is highly likely) then his dads job is completely irrelevant here. No reason to even mention his dads job apart from to trigger anti police sentiments which has had the desired effect in your case .
As ive said i would expect anyone being done twice for drug driving to serve time as clearly being let off the 1st time hasnt got through his thick head how lucky he was, and yeah i think hes a cops son has had some influence over the judges decision, i also fully expect to read about this arsehole again before long, just hope theres no one else involved.
 
So you dont think things like this are a reason for the anti- police rhetoric ?, i would honestly expect any young lad having been caught drug driving twice and dealing to expect some porridge, perhaps they are waiting until he ploughs into someone else while off his face 1st.
Police have no control over what sentence the court gives though. If it was down to corruption then the case wouldn't have got to court. Seems to me that the police have done their job but for whatever reason the courts have decided against a custodial sentence.
 
Police have no control over what sentence the court gives though. If it was down to corruption then the case wouldn't have got to court. Seems to me that the police have done their job but for whatever reason the courts have decided against a custodial sentence.
I get that mate i just feel that maybe the judge has been lenient because he is a cops son, i genuinely feel if his parents were (for example) unemployed the outcome would have been different.
 
I get that mate i just feel that maybe the judge has been lenient because he is a cops son, i genuinely feel if his parents were (for example) unemployed the outcome would have been different.
Courts aren’t in anyway lenient to police. They get weighed off just as harshly as Joe Public when they’re convicted and rightly so.
 

Back
Top