The Situation
Striker
Potter was on the verge of a breakdown so this result might take him one step back on the "Homeless Ian Beale" lookalike tracker.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you quote a very small part of a larger rule and then miss the point completely. What a muppet. Get on ignore you fool.Like I said, only 2 rows were applicable to this incident and it's a piece of piss to follow and you don't have to be smart to work it out at all. The table is to make it simpler for people to understand as it's a summary table of the rules.
In this case, it was missed and the opposing player cleared the ball away so retake it as he should be clearing it away. That's the basics as the outcome changes for a Chelsea player scoring a follow up. If you can't follow what happens after a penna is missed (or scored) depending on a player being in the penna area then that's you as an individual.
Did you even click the link? The other parts of the table apply to the keeper coming off his line, a player stuttering his swinging kick, a player kicking the ball backwards etc which are different rules. Before you bitch about the long rules, it's exactly the same numerous rules that can affect a free kick, corner, goal kick etc and they can have a load of separate lines also. As has been shown on here, people aren't aware of every part of the rule and then start moaning about decisions because they only know the basics.
Basically you're bitching about something that isn't there (at a guess, I'd dare say it's more to do with you not liking VAR) as it's just various rules hoyed in a table. In reality it was 1 part of the penalty rule regarding encroachment and very simple to work out for officials as the rule that came into effect is highlighted in red below. Most people probably know a few penna rules already like the keeper can't come off his line, the kicker can't kick the ball if it comes back off the post etc. Some will have seen this encroachment rule come into effect in the past as VAR now checks for it every time, hence why a few posters in this thread explained to others why it happened.
Offences and sanctions
Once the referee has signalled for a penalty kick to be taken, the kick must be taken; if it is not taken the referee may take disciplinary action before signalling again for the kick to be taken.
If, before the ball is in play, one of the following occurs:
the player taking the penalty kick or a team-mate offends:
except for the following when play will be stopped and restarted with an indirect free kick, regardless of whether or not a goal is scored:
- if the ball enters the goal, the kick is retaken
- if the ball does not enter the goal, the referee stops play and restarts with an indirect free kick
the goalkeeper offends:
- a penalty kick is kicked backwards
- a team-mate of the identified kicker takes the kick; the referee cautions the player who took the kick
- feinting to kick the ball once the kicker has completed the run-up (feinting in the run-up is permitted); the referee cautions the kicker
If the goalkeeper’s offence results in the kick being retaken, the goalkeeper is warned for the first offence in the game and cautioned for any subsequent offence(s) in the game
- if the ball enters the goal, a goal is awarded
- if the ball misses the goal or rebounds from the crossbar or goalpost(s), the kick is only retaken if the goalkeeper’s offence clearly impacted on the kicker
- if the ball is prevented from entering the goal by the goalkeeper, the kick is retaken
a team-mate of the goalkeeper offends:
a player of both teams offends, the kick is retaken unless a player commits a more serious offence (e.g. 'illegal' feinting);
- if the ball enters the goal, a goal is awarded
- if the ball does not enter the goal, the kick is retaken
both the goalkeeper and the kicker commit an offence at the same time, the kicker is cautioned and play restarts with an indirect free kick to the defending team
If, after the penalty kick has been taken:
the ball rebounds into the field of play from the goalkeeper, the crossbar or the goalposts and is then touched by an outside agent:
- the kicker touches the ball again before it has touched another player:
- an indirect free kick (or direct free kick for a handball offence) is awarded
- the ball is touched by an outside agent as it moves forward:
- the kick is retaken unless the ball is going into the goal and the interference does not prevent the goalkeeper or defending player playing the ball, in which case the goal is awarded if the ball enters the goal (even if contact was made with the ball) unless the interference was by the attacking team.
- the referee stops play
- play is restarted with a dropped ball at the position where it touched the outside agent
Personal insults but there's only 1 muppet fool here expecting footy rules to be basic as fuck and just 1 line longSo you quote a very small part of a larger rule and then miss the point completely. What a muppet. Get on ignore you fool.
U have a pointThat’s different from being a poor team. Man Utd were rubbish on Sunday, doesn’t make them a poor team.
Aye as you say it's SEB but to add more to my earlier post, that's his own interpretation of the rule. It's incorrect and misleading people as he's adding the bit about it impacting an opponent and a Chelsea player kicking it. The rule itself is pretty basic as you see below.
Looks like it shouldn't have been retaken after it, the amount of obscure rules in our game is ridiculous.
Just send it's seb
The simple answer to this is that both teams encroached a stupid amount so common sense says 2 wrongs make a right and play on. Same if one of the Chelsea players tapped it in - goal stands.
Looks like it shouldn't have been retaken after it, the amount of obscure rules in our game is ridiculous.
Just send it's seb