Ashley In!!
Striker
I mean if the original penalty shot goes in I don't think they'd have pulled the Chelsea player encroaching. Here nor there now.It would have with var. 100%. He likely wouldn't have scored it without the encroachment.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I mean if the original penalty shot goes in I don't think they'd have pulled the Chelsea player encroaching. Here nor there now.It would have with var. 100%. He likely wouldn't have scored it without the encroachment.
This is the image I've seen before a few years back and what confuses people who don't know about it. It's in Law 14If players from both teams are guilty of encroachment the penalty is retaken, not matter if its a goal or not.
It’s because they have a European interpretation - don’t you know?Stunning penalty and VAR analysis.
This will not be given. Correct decision.
This will be given. Correct decision.
No better demonstrated than with Peter Walton completely changing his mind.Well I’ve learned something new this evening.
Football rule makers over complicate such a simple game, and VAR just makes it all worse.
Was he not standing in the D?They’re talking absolute shite her mind. The person who cleared the hall wasn’t even in the box ffs.
It’s a farce var like
If you need a what if analysis to explain a rule, the rule is fuckedThis is the image I've seen before a few years back and what confuses people who don't know about it. It's in Law 14
![]()
Logon or register to see this image
It's staggering that he used to be a professional premier league referee, just shows you the standardIt’s because they have a European interpretation - don’t you know?![]()
Looks like he was in the D. That's encroachment. It's as off limits as the box is.They’re talking absolute shite her mind. The person who cleared the hall wasn’t even in the box ffs.
It’s a farce var like
He just goes with whatever the officials gan with everytime it’s a complete waste of time having him on.No better demonstrated than with Peter Walton completely changing his mind.
Case closed then. Cheers for that.This is the image I've seen before a few years back and what confuses people who don't know about it. It's in Law 14
![]()
Logon or register to see this image
Might have missed this but is the Dortmund right centre half / right back a fan thats won a competition to play?
He's not the most athletic looking footballer I've ever seen
I don't need an analysis as I just posted it here to make it simple for others to see as quite often people on here (and elsewhere, especially tw@tter) bitch on yet some don't have a clue about the rules or think they know or that they should be what they think is better.If you need a what if analysis to explain a rule, the rule is fucked
They’re talking absolute shite her mind. The person who cleared the hall wasn’t even in the box ffs.
It’s a farce var like
Aye, just people don't know the rules so blame VAR for it. It doesn't always mean a retake as he explains in the Grealish example.Looks like he was in the D. That's encroachment. It's as off limits as the box is.