Mowgli
Striker
he's a footballer, end of.Criminal Justice Act 2003 made a change to the Bail Act in that...
Subsection (1) requires the court to refuse bail to an adult defendant who was on bail in criminal proceedings at the date of the offence, unless the court is satisfied that there is no significant risk that he would commit an offence if released on bail. This replaces paragraph 2A of Part I of Schedule 1 of the Bail Act 1976 (which provides that a defendant need not be granted bail if he was on bail at the time of the alleged offence).
http://www.wikicrimeline.co.uk/index.php?title=Offences_committed_on_bail
He is therefore a lucky boy if this is true as the judge has clear guidelines here to remove the bail unless there is no signficant risk he will re-offend. For me, considering these are both similar offences, I'm really not sure how the judge could come to that conclusion.