It has been more than implied from day one manDid they? I don’t remember seeing them say he had over 50%.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It has been more than implied from day one manDid they? I don’t remember seeing them say he had over 50%.
Interviewing the managerial candidates. Same source that told me months ago about 41,34,20, 5. Posted that plenty on here in recent weeks only for the bootlickers to tell me it was bollocks and that KLD had 51% minimum.Source?
Interviewing the managerial candidates. Same source that told me months ago about 41,34,20, 5. Posted that plenty on here in recent weeks only for the bootlickers to tell me it was bollocks and that KLD had 51% minimum.
Why would you expect KLd to put his hand in his pocket then?Did they? I don’t remember seeing them say he had over 50%.
If he has control he need's to start acting like it and keep anyone who is not an officer of the company away from safc business. I saw his wording in December where he stated he had A Governance Majority which nailed it for me that he didn't have any actual majority of Ord Shares (albeit I have been told this was the case anyway). The wording Governance Majority more than hints at alphabet shares for voting rights and separately income rights obviously just being pari passu with ordinary share equity stakes. Whatever their intentions were with the secrecy around the shareholdings it has backfired massively.If he was involved in interviews that was an error. Doesn't matter what percentages are as long as KLD has majority of voting rights. Wait and see is all we can do.
If he has control he need's to start acting like it and keep anyone who is not an officer of the company away from safc business. I saw his wording in December where he stated he had A Governance Majority which nailed it for me that he didn't have any actual majority of Ord Shares (albeit I have been told this was the case anyway). The wording Governance Majority more than hints at alphabet shares for voting rights and separately income rights obviously just being pari passu with ordinary share equity stakes. Whatever their intentions were with the secrecy around the shareholdings it has backfired massively.
Links?It has been more than implied from day one man
Huh?Why would you expect KLd to put his hand in his pocket then?
You claim they've never made it sound like he was mahor shareholder. Yet you wanted him to dip in his pocket.Links?
Huh?
www.readytogo.net
Jesus you’ve actually read back through all my posts for a year and the best you can do to trip me up is find me saying I hope the new regime buy some players?You claim they've never made it sound like he was mahor shareholder. Yet you wanted him to dip in his pocket.
Hope springs eternal
the inevitable has happened - yet more frustration and despair for the millions of Sunderland fans around the globe - another kick in the teeth - but we''ll get over it and some sunny day we'll rise again. Come July we'll start to rekindle our hopes and dreams as we rebuild and set out anew on...www.readytogo.net
Just proves you weren't being honest saying it was obviousJesus you’ve actually read back through all my posts for a year and the best you can do to trip me up is find me saying I hope the new regime buy some players?
Lock me up and throw away the key officer, guilty as charged!![]()
Just really basic shit buddy. They called it a takeover. It wasn’t. They called it a start to a new era. It wasn’t. They constantly talked about control and it isn’t.Links?
Huh?
Why do people on this board insist on telling me I’ve said things I haven’t?Just proves you weren't being honest saying it was obvious
The wording was intended to mislead like. You also had the usual club stooges on here demanding everybody agreed he had 51%+ as they knew accounting and how companies work.Why do people on this board insist on telling me I’ve said things I haven’t?
I said that nobody at the club told us he owned the whole club, or even more than 50% of it, people assumed it. Can you share a link with a quote from the club to contradict that and show them saying he bought more than half the shares by himself?
So you’re annoyed that someone on a message board assumed he bought 51% but actually he only bought 40%, and KLD had the absolute gall to not come in here and correct that assertion?The wording was intended to mislead like. You also had the usual club stooges on here demanding everybody agreed he had 51%+ as they knew accounting and how companies work.