Can we put the pitch-forks away now?


Status
Not open for further replies.
Interviewing the managerial candidates. Same source that told me months ago about 41,34,20, 5. Posted that plenty on here in recent weeks only for the bootlickers to tell me it was bollocks and that KLD had 51% minimum.

If he was involved in interviews that was an error. Doesn't matter what percentages are as long as KLD has majority of voting rights. Wait and see is all we can do.
 
If he was involved in interviews that was an error. Doesn't matter what percentages are as long as KLD has majority of voting rights. Wait and see is all we can do.
If he has control he need's to start acting like it and keep anyone who is not an officer of the company away from safc business. I saw his wording in December where he stated he had A Governance Majority which nailed it for me that he didn't have any actual majority of Ord Shares (albeit I have been told this was the case anyway). The wording Governance Majority more than hints at alphabet shares for voting rights and separately income rights obviously just being pari passu with ordinary share equity stakes. Whatever their intentions were with the secrecy around the shareholdings it has backfired massively.
 
If he has control he need's to start acting like it and keep anyone who is not an officer of the company away from safc business. I saw his wording in December where he stated he had A Governance Majority which nailed it for me that he didn't have any actual majority of Ord Shares (albeit I have been told this was the case anyway). The wording Governance Majority more than hints at alphabet shares for voting rights and separately income rights obviously just being pari passu with ordinary share equity stakes. Whatever their intentions were with the secrecy around the shareholdings it has backfired massively.

As I said - the situation has the whiff of Donald and Methven about it - I'm choosing to believe KLD and he has control.
 
Links?

Huh?
You claim they've never made it sound like he was mahor shareholder. Yet you wanted him to dip in his pocket.
 
You claim they've never made it sound like he was mahor shareholder. Yet you wanted him to dip in his pocket.
Jesus you’ve actually read back through all my posts for a year and the best you can do to trip me up is find me saying I hope the new regime buy some players?

Lock me up and throw away the key officer, guilty as charged! 😂
 
Jesus you’ve actually read back through all my posts for a year and the best you can do to trip me up is find me saying I hope the new regime buy some players?

Lock me up and throw away the key officer, guilty as charged! 😂
Just proves you weren't being honest saying it was obvious
 
Just proves you weren't being honest saying it was obvious
Why do people on this board insist on telling me I’ve said things I haven’t?

I said that nobody at the club told us he owned the whole club, or even more than 50% of it, people assumed it. Can you share a link with a quote from the club to contradict that and show them saying he bought more than half the shares by himself?

And for what it’s worth, I honestly don’t care how much of the club he owns, I just care that the club improve. And although our performance in the league this year suggests we haven’t, I personally feel we have laid much more solid foundations to work from this year with improvements off the pitch. I do wish we had been more competitive in the league, but back to my original point, I don’t see the need to constantly be calling for someone to be sacked, and I don’t think either Speakman or KLD should leave.
 
Last edited:
Why do people on this board insist on telling me I’ve said things I haven’t?

I said that nobody at the club told us he owned the whole club, or even more than 50% of it, people assumed it. Can you share a link with a quote from the club to contradict that and show them saying he bought more than half the shares by himself?
The wording was intended to mislead like. You also had the usual club stooges on here demanding everybody agreed he had 51%+ as they knew accounting and how companies work.
 
The wording was intended to mislead like. You also had the usual club stooges on here demanding everybody agreed he had 51%+ as they knew accounting and how companies work.
So you’re annoyed that someone on a message board assumed he bought 51% but actually he only bought 40%, and KLD had the absolute gall to not come in here and correct that assertion?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top