Brazil complain to FIFA


Status
Not open for further replies.
That's not var failing. It's the onfield referee holding firm in his decision.

All matter of opinion decision are down to the onfield referee. We've seen one change his mind.
You keep going on about the rules suggesting that it is not failing. If it rectifies some bad or missed decisions but not others - which is undeniably happening - can you tell me what it is improving? I was under the impression that it was introduced to get more consistent decisions - if so, its failing.
 
The var official can ASSIST.the ref by suggesting he made an error.

If the onfield referee decides he has not, then there is nothing the var officials can do.
Yes, we understand. However, the refs are being proven wrong. From that point of view it is an utter failure. Can you suggest what it is supposed to be improving?
 
If the ref, decrees no pen and var asks, and he communicates that, then that's it.

If the VAR has looked at it and seen nothing wrong then it's a joke. Equally if the ref has said that he clearly saw it and doesn't need to have another look because he's happy with his decision then he needs to be sent home because he obviously doesn't have a f***ing clue
 
Var has not been ignored. It's the on field ref, sticking to his opinion, they were not pens.

Nowt different from any previous world cup
There is a problem of when refs do and don't decide to use VAR. Maybe some see it as undermining them rather than a tool to help them. In rugby when the TMO suggests the ref look at an incident they do then discuss it but the ref makes the final decision. I just don't see why VAR can't be used in the same way instead of fans wondering why an incident hasn't been reviewed.
 
You keep going on about the rules suggesting that it is not failing. If it rectifies some bad or missed decisions but not others - which is undeniably happening - can you tell me what it is improving? I was under the impression that it was introduced to get more consistent decisions - if so, its failing.
I'll say it again. The onfield referee is the sole arbitrator of decision in live situations.

If something has happened which the var officials think he has missed, they contact him.

If he insists he saw the incident and that's it, nothing var can chance.

If he then has a doubt, the game stops and he reviews it.

Matter of opinion decisions are still the area where the onfield ref is king.
 
If they insist on having it they should give each team 2 challenges each. If you use one and the decision goes against you, you lose it. It the decision is changed you get to keep it. VAR decision should be final as refs are less likely to admit mistakes. Nicked/adapted from how the cricket do it.

Something player initiated would be better than the current shambles.
 
I'm not the head boss of FIFA.

I've given clear posts on how it's being used.

Straightforward to read.
What you are doing is quoting rules which is easy to do. The rest of the world is suggesting that while you may be correct that is being correctly applied that it is in fact not making decision making better or anymore consistent. If you cannot give us your opinion there is no need for anymore replies because I clearly get that you are good at quoting FIFA.
 
There is a problem of when refs do and don't decide to use VAR. Maybe some see it as undermining them rather than a tool to help them. In rugby when the TMO suggests the ref look at an incident they do then discuss it but the ref makes the final decision. I just don't see why VAR can't be used in the same way instead of fans wondering why an incident hasn't been reviewed.
This will come with time.

All video technologies went through a learning period and are used now, with mostly nobody batting an eyelid.
 
I'll say it again. The onfield referee is the sole arbitrator of decision in live situations.

If something has happened which the var officials think he has missed, they contact him.

If he insists he saw the incident and that's it, nothing var can chance.

If he then has a doubt, the game stops and he reviews it.

Matter of opinion decisions are still the area where the onfield ref is king.
But when it is then shown that the ref is wrong it is simply making a joke of the whole thing. I highly doubt it will be persisted with.
 
The England v Tunisia game would have had a different outcome. Khazri wouldn’t have been offside and possibly made Pickford look silly

And obviously the possible 2 penalties

Khazri might not have scored either. Its not for that. Its to check all is well if the ball has ended up in the net.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top