deleted user 785
Striker
A push that gained an unfair advantage. It was a foulA little push. The player did not react.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A push that gained an unfair advantage. It was a foulA little push. The player did not react.
Which takes us back to the ref in the England match either being a cheat or incompetent.It's not a joke. What is a joke is the lack of understanding when it's to be used and how.
It's straightforward, the ref is in contact with the var officials.
He is the sole arbitrator on the pitch and var is there to assist him.
If he feels after being asked to check a decision, or var contact him about things and he replies, no, then that is it
Video ASSISTANT referee. It's there to assist and not takeover.
The incidents in the England game were not referred as the referee declared he had seen them and deemed them not a penalty.
That is nothing different to any game in the past, and we all have seen enough of what we thought were pens but the ref didn't.
I just don't think FIFA are very good.Brazil seek answers from FIFA regarding VAR after World Cup draw against Switzerland
Rightly so. The whole set up is a joke. They either us it properly or not at all.
It seems like FIFA want it to fail.
I think complaining might bite them in the arse though if it ever goes against them in the next rounds![]()
Which is as football has always beenWhich takes us back to the ref in the England match either being a cheat or incompetent.
He was from Colombia, wasn't he ? Wonder what the cartels were betting on ?
Technology is a bit pointless, then.Which is as football has always been
A dig in the back. The player did not react, therefore it could not have been that much.A push that gained an unfair advantage. It was a foul
A dig in the back. The player did not react, therefore it could not have been that much.