Black Cat Logo

Status
Not open for further replies.
Those black cats on the north stand are embarrassing.
 


:lol:
Unauthorised shirt adornment was the reason.

Sponsors logo of a certain size.
Club badge of a certain size.
Manufacturers logo of a certain size.
PL Logo of a certain size.
Is all thats allowed.

Some forrin owners want adverts on the back above the number and on the bottom below the number and on the shorts anarl. Scudamore may be an arse but hes fighting against that as it makes the shirts look tacky and indistinguishable form Mexican and Scottish ones plus itd devalue both the PL & Main Sponsors effect.
We've got a forrin owner.

So how come Liverpool have managed to do it?
 
It was something to do with it being the logo of the SAFC Supporters Association. That meant along with Reg Vardy and Asics we had 3 'company' logos on our shirt when the maximum allowed was 2.

Take the first sentence out and youre on the nail.

So how come Liverpool have managed to do it?

Mebbes the laws have changed? My post was referring to back then not now....though it doesnt read that way. Sorry.
 
Take the first sentence out and youre on the nail.



Mebbes the laws have changed? My post was referring to back then not now....though it doesnt read that way. Sorry.

Any chance you can write to the FA about this riffraff lad as I know you feel as strongly about it as I do :lol: :cool:
 
:lol:
Unauthorised shirt adornment was the reason.

Sponsors logo of a certain size.
Club badge of a certain size.
Manufacturers logo of a certain size.
PL Logo of a certain size.
Is all thats allowed.

Some forrin owners want adverts on the back above the number and on the bottom below the number and on the shorts anarl. Scudamore may be an arse but hes fighting against that as it makes the shirts look tacky and indistinguishable form Mexican and Scottish ones plus itd devalue both the PL & Main Sponsors effect.
We've got a forrin owner.

That doesn't make sense, the black cat isn't a sponsor.

Liverpool have "96" with the flames on the back above the name
 
If you want to change the name of a 100 year old stadium, fill your ground with tacky adverts, or change the colour of your home strip it's fine, but stick a tiny traditional emblem on your sleeve you get clamped down on.

If it had been one of the Premier League's darling clubs it would have been fine. Remember when we tried to sign Brad Friedel, but couldn't get a work permit for him, Liverpool then came in for him and got one nee bother?
 
If we have a black cat anywhere can we return to it just being ... well, a black cat?

Is it really necessary for it to be a growling, claws out, stalking PANTHER that's COMING TO GET YAH! coz Sunderland footballers are just so scary and threatening and massively aggressive and cunning?

It's a football club emblem. Can't it just be a cat?
 
If you want to change the name of a 100 year old stadium, fill your ground with tacky adverts, or change the colour of your home strip it's fine, but stick a tiny traditional emblem on your sleeve you get clamped down on.

If it had been one of the Premier League's darling clubs it would have been fine. Remember when we tried to sign Brad Friedel, but couldn't get a work permit for him, Liverpool then came in for him and got one nee bother?
Nice to see these 20 year grudges are still maintained.
 
That doesn't make sense, the black cat isn't a sponsor.

Liverpool have "96" with the flames on the back above the name

They might have got permission from the Premier League to put it on for the season after the whole enquiry thing. Even if they haven't there is no way the Premier League will make them remove it due to its significance.

They let us put a Foundation of Light sticker on our shirts for a game the other year too.
 
This is why we have been fighting relegation all those years players don't have their good luck charm.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top