Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wright has had too many chances but bell hasn't? Aye, right! Hope bell does play well but I can't see it happening, been poor in his recent one day games.Why?
Bell is a quality player, with a good average and strike rate in ODIs in Australia and NZ over the last few years
I wouldn't mind seeing Hales in there, but Bell has to play for me.
I agree on most apart from Luke Wright, who has had too many chances
I'd be happy with Hales in the team for sure, but Bell has to play for me, we know he can play these international bowlers, OK he doesn't get the massive scores but he is still a class act and will score runs in Oz.
Its one of Taylor or Hales, not both
Saying that I want Ballance in there, but that depends on whether they will bowl Bopara, if they won't, then he is not one of the best ODI batsmen in England, he simply isn't
Wright has had too many chances but bell hasn't? Aye, right! Hope bell does play well but I can't see it happening, been poor in his recent one day games.
I agree. My point was that bell has played 150 odi's and not nailed down a place. He gets a start, looks great then slows down, gets bogged down and gets out. How many more times is he going to get recalled and do the same thing again. When do we move on and try something else? He has 3 100s so why do people think he's the person to build the innings around or give us a better chance of batting 50 overs when he's consistently proved incapable of doing that?How on earth can you compare wright to bell , he isn't fit enough to clean his boots, Haway mate be serious
I agree. My point was that bell has played 150 odi's and not nailed down a place. He gets a start, looks great then slows down, gets bogged down and gets out. How many more times is he going to get recalled and do the same thing again. When do we move on and try something else? He has 3 100s so why do people think he's the person to build the innings around or give us a better chance of batting 50 overs when he's consistently proved incapable of doing that?
I agree. My point was that bell has played 150 odi's and not nailed down a place. He gets a start, looks great then slows down, gets bogged down and gets out. How many more times is he going to get recalled and do the same thing again. When do we move on and try something else? He has 3 100s so why do people think he's the person to build the innings around or give us a better chance of batting 50 overs when he's consistently proved incapable of doing that?
It will but I cant see many 100 partnerships.I know what you mean but a good 50 each at a good strike rate by Ali and Bell and we would be well on our way to a good score.
I think it's optimistic to think that. He's an experienced pro who's had chances in a variety roles and not nailed it.I do see your point, I just think we have been so mis-managed in terms of ODIs in the past, not one of them seemed to know their role. Opening with Cook was tough for Bell as the pressure was on him to keep the board moving quickly. I think with Ali/Hales, he will hopefully be able to play his natural attacking game without feeling the need to go all out.
Scores 187 from 145 overnight
70s from Modern Ali and Taylor
Canny
Obviously I've never claimed to be an expertIt will but I cant see many 100 partnerships.
I think it's optimistic to think that. He's an experienced pro who's had chances in a variety roles and not nailed it.
I hope he proves me wrong and brings the cup home for us, he's definitely got the class his problems are in his head.
Has it? Have England won the world cup and Tri series thanks to bell's heroics?Cricket forum karma strikes again.
Cracking knock.
You must be logged on to see external links
PS bowling a massive cause for concern like - Jordan has been awful!