Begovic on Fletch GIF


Status
Not open for further replies.
I have done many times. Read it as many times as you want.

It's not a penalty, it's not a red card.

Move on.

Any player who raises his studs and collects another player is reckless and should be red carded. They usually are. No ifs, no buts.
 
unfortunately it was cos the ref gave it and therefore if being consistent Begovic should have gone, in the split second he gets to see that challenge I can't understand how he can reach any other decision than a red given his decision re Brown
The fact he was 40 yards behind play may have had something to do with it.
 
I have done many times. Read it as many times as you want.

It's not a penalty, it's not a red card.

Move on.
Studs up, lunge, off the ground and out of control.

The only difference between this and a normal dangerous play foul was that it would have been a neck breaker rather than a leg breaker.
 
Referees referee a game to the laws of the game. If they make a mistake they make a mistake. They then don't referee a game to their own (often poor) standards and base their future decisions on previous decisions. They carry on to the letter of the law. Only fans do that after they've been wronged.

Red cards are for professional fouls and excessive force. 'Reckless' tackles are yellow's and nothing more.

The ref has sent Brown off for excessive force and he's dropped a bollock. Never excessive and never a red.

Begovic is not excessive force. Reckless maybe at a push.
Reckless is an understatement. But of its a reckless challenge that results in a yellow card then we have a penalty? The very least we deserved!
 
I have done many times. Read it as many times as you want.

It's not a penalty, it's not a red card.

Move on.


From the FA's own guidelines, just to refresh your memory.

(c) Goalkeepers:
Goalkeepers, when advancing to catch the ball, sometimes raise one leg in an outward direction to
keep opposing players at a distance. If an opponent is in close proximity to the goalkeeper, the
referee may well consider such action constitutes careless or even reckless play, but if the
opponent is further away then it would be deemed dangerous play and be punished accordingly



Let's not move on just yet
 
i am starting to think that when all the heat was on last season about pdc's fascist beliefs the fa tried to intervene and short told them where to go hence the amount of disgraceful decisions by refs against us this season either that or we are in for a hell of end of the season if you believe these refs decisions balance each other out over the season
 
Bollocks. Take off the biased specs he attacked the ball, fletcher cowered out and was already lying on the deck when begovic kicked the ball. No penalty.
If fletcher had continued his run and nicked the ball and then got cleaned out, penalty and straight red. You dont get penaltys for things that might have happened if such and such did so and so

Bollocks yourself. He actually made contact with Fletcher, so that's your argument fucked. If Fletcher had gone for that ball he really could have been killed, that's how bad that challenge was.
 
Bollocks. Take off the biased specs he attacked the ball, fletcher cowered out and was already lying on the deck when begovic kicked the ball. No penalty.
If fletcher had continued his run and nicked the ball and then got cleaned out, penalty and straight red. You dont get penaltys for things that might have happened if such and such did so and so
haha u pissed lad
 
That challenge should surely have been classed as dangerous play FFS, if Fletcher didn't pull out he could quite easily have been put out for the season, it was definitely dangerous play which should have resulted in a pen, simple as.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top