wanny
Striker
And, once again, rather than allowing me my own opinions, they are called an 'agenda' and dismissed, purely because they differ. The thread started with someone dishing out abuse to someone who doesn't rate the player, with plenty others following suit, and then they have the nerve to try and cry foul play.
There is no agenda from me, no conspiracy, nothing sinister. I simply don't rate the player. No idea why so many refuse to accept that. I just don't think Phil Bardsley is very good. It is an opinion. I'm allowed one.
The really funny thing is that any second, someone else so dumbfounded that their opinion is not being universally recognised as the definitive one will be along to condemn me for my arrogance and high opinion of myself, like Rentaghost did last night.
Agenda doesn't suggest anything sinister, merely something that's always on your list of things to discuss.
Everyone's entitled to their opinion. That works both ways...
The majority believe he's a decent player; not fantastic, but certainly not shite; and that's the reality.