errant
Striker
nothing at all to do with their chairman though...No think it might of been due to backlash mind.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
nothing at all to do with their chairman though...No think it might of been due to backlash mind.
it will soon be illegal to question st marcus on any matter
surely not , he`s a living saint folk cant be allowed to get away with that !!!Some people have been slagging him off for years and won't be worried.
what is your issue with Rashford? why are you attacking him?surely not , he`s a living saint folk cant be allowed to get away with that !!!
i personally dont have a issue with st rash , but i reserve the right for anyone to attack him ( non physically and within the boundries of the law of course)what is your issue with Rashford? why are you attacking him?
you're attacking him for doing charitable work?i personally dont have a issue with st rash , but i reserve the right for anyone to attack him ( non physically and within the boundries of the law of course)
Wants the right to attack Rashford even after all he’s done regarding helping hungry kids.you're attacking him for doing charitable work?
there is something wrong with you
Any facts or evidence, even anecdotes from the staff, that the Chairman is involved in the editorial of this publication? Let alone involvement in this particular unpublished story. Or is this all just supposition?Given his background, you have to be pretty naive to think he wouldn't be involved tbh
I have never got past Morgan being the gossip or was it pop reporter? in the Daily Mirror which got passed around the sixth form common room in 1982. Odious manI can't get away with either of them. I think Neil is more ideological (right wing) and a better businessman who can employ people to make him look good. Morgan strikes me as a money chasing grifter who would sell his mother if things got desperate enough.
i can see me n you have some good battles on here in the coming years , lets be frenemiesyou're attacking him for doing charitable work?
there is something wrong with you
this place boils everyones piss at one time or other , but for me its the best board on the entire planeOh but they aren't racist, perish the thought. Boils my piss this place at times.
surely not , he`s a living saint folk cant be allowed to get away with that !!!
you can have a pop at bame`s without being racist you knowI know - it's surprising how many racists are out there.
Not all Brexiteers are racists. Seriously.The Venn diagram of Rashford haters, racists, brexiteers, flat earthers and covid deniers is just a circle really
Any evidence that he isn’t?Any facts or evidence, even anecdotes from the staff, that the Chairman is involved in the editorial of this publication? Let alone involvement in this particular unpublished story. Or is this all just supposition?
I know living in a post facts world of fake news and misinformation is all the rage, but sometimes it’s good to back some stuff up.
Erm. Yeah. Him not being the editor kinda means he wouldn’t be involved in the editorial. That’s the job of the editor. Fact. Unless there’s evidence that AN is pulling the editors strings?Any evidence that he isn’t?
So you have none. We took the scenic route but got there eventuallyErm. Yeah. Him not being the editor kinda means he wouldn’t be involved in the editorial. That’s the job of the editor. Fact. Unless there’s evidence that AN is pulling the editors strings?
Who knows, maybe he is. I just find it unbelievable that people just say something that they think, based on nothing much, and people just accept that and nod along.
I’ll leave it there. A thread of misinformation is not for me.