Town End Farmer Giles
Striker
Boris and his chums siphoning off billions but let's go after the black lad from a poor background for standing up to them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nothing to understand - my opinion is different to yours Cat, it's life!do you attack Henderson for his charitable work too then?
I'm trying to understand your issue with Rashford
Nothing to understand - my opinion is different to yours Cat, it's life!
Henderson does not shout from the rooftops and crave attention every 5mins for it. Most high profile people including footballers are the same.
Rashford is generally defending himself or raising awareness to garner donations for his foundationsNothing to understand - my opinion is different to yours Cat, it's life!
Henderson does not shout from the rooftops and crave attention every 5mins for it. Most high profile people including footballers are the same.
Nothing to understand - my opinion is different to yours Cat, it's life!
Henderson does not shout from the rooftops and crave attention every 5mins for it. Most high profile people including footballers are the same.
Tidied - imoRashford is generally defending himself or raising awareness to garner donations for his foundations / personal gain and promotion of Brand Marcus.
but Henderson is doing it why?Tidied - imo
Tidied - imo
Why do you have such a chip on your shoulder about Marcus Rashford?
Are you jealous of how much he's helping people or something?
I genuinely can't get your issue with him. He's not making himself out to be a saviour. He's just doing what he thinks is right.
He actually changed government policy to help children during a pandemic.
You can shove your "Brand Marcus" up your hoop. The government were happy to let children starve
I think it's the other way round - the charities are profiting from his partnershipsIt was a matter of time...
I think many suspected he'd be profiting from his 'charity work' all along
Marcus Rashford defends charity deals over profit claims
The England striker asks why footballers "can't just do the right thing" for charity.www.bbc.co.uk
Henderson has done loads for the NHS - not a mention of him despite his partnerships with Nivea etcIf it was Harry Kane - nice white Essex boy - would they be as critical
Just asking
I'll meet you in Tesco car park later - tops off...last man standing winsI'd happily fight anyone who criticises Rashford's charity work
I think it's the other way round - the charities are profiting from his partnerships
He just quietly gets on with itHenderson has done loads for the NHS - not a mention of him despite his partnerships with Nivea etc
What a load of rubbish! I'm happy for folk to disagree but I will call out factually incorrect stuff like this. During the pandemic there was more help given from authorities and publicly funded orgs than there has ever been ever in time. No child was ever going to starve due to govt policy. I have no strong political views but I will defend them on this.He actually changed government policy to help children during a pandemic.
You can shove your "Brand Marcus" up your hoop. The government were happy to let children starve
As I suspected you have nothing at all to back up your petty spiteJust coincidental that his own profile has been raised in the process?
Well done on your charity work.
It'll all come out in the end.
I'm all for helping the vulnerable when it's required but not for personal gain.
I'll meet you in Tesco car park later - tops off...last man standing wins
He just quietly gets on with it
What a load of rubbish! I'm happy for folk to disagree but I will call out factually incorrect stuff like this. During the pandemic there was more help given from authorities and publicly funded orgs than there has ever been ever in time. No child was ever going to starve due to govt policy. I have no strong political views but I will defend them on this.
A Chairman would have no input into editorial. Basic stuff this.
Because he’s still likely to have input on editorial.How has this got anything to do with Andrew Neil? He’s just the Chairman of the Spectator. A Chairman would have no input into editorial. Basic stuff this.
Exactly.How has this got anything to do with Andrew Neil? He’s just the Chairman of the Spectator. A Chairman would have no input into editorial. Basic stuff this.