steve30000
Striker
Besiktas have agreed a loan deal for him. don't know why this threads still goingReally hope this one comes off, not the finished product but easily good enough for us.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Besiktas have agreed a loan deal for him. don't know why this threads still goingReally hope this one comes off, not the finished product but easily good enough for us.
which is exactly what I'm saying. You are so negative, static electricity from you could supply Gateshead for a fortnightim not. just saying it how i feel, sorry like.
which is exactly what I'm saying. You are so negative, static electricity from you could supply Gateshead for a fortnight
He hasnt signed though as he?, i think man yoo would prefer him to get games in the english game rather than turkey.Besiktas have agreed a loan deal for him. don't know why this threads still going
Not another loan ffs.
you're not allowed to say that, its negative.Not another loan ffs.
Probably, but who knows the finances behind it? Loan fee, percentage of wages etc.He hasnt signed though as he?, i think man yoo would prefer him to get games in the english game rather than turkey.
So what if they did - the team are clearly still working away at it. Was the solution to work up til a week to go then wave the white flag and give in?
We still haven't established what you would have done facing the same situation.
wages. i thought he was getting better, i can't see anything wrong with him as a player[DOUBLEPOST=1377944991][/DOUBLEPOST]
im not. just saying it how i feel, sorry like.
wrong.
ive clearly said that i don't like loans, but if we have no other choice then we'll have to won't we? am i not allowed to say that? even though various other posters have said the same thing?
![]()
exactly thisSteve man it's not just about your opinion on loans. You've earned your reputation through the almost constant moaning about almost all things SAFC. The occasional neutral & even rarer positive post probably get buried under the sheer tonnage of your negative posts. Of all the posters that have come & gone or are still here I can only think of My Boy Harry who could rival you for negativity.
What is the relevance of what I would have done?
OK then, let's go with Colback and Čelůstka as cover. We can always use Bardsely and Gardner at RB.
If we can't buy we still absolutely must have someone in.
if you're happy to point out what you think has gone wrong, you should know why and what you would have done differently. Otherwise how is your assertion credible, as your reasoning is apparently 'just because'. If then you reasoning is'just because', people could be forgiven for thinking you've no other instinct but to get at the club no matter what was done - in leaving out what your solution would have been you look like you're leaving yourself something else to moan about just in case your argument falls flat.
New manager comes in, he wants to put his own mark / ideas /team on the field. Unless your of really good quality ,ie Johnson,fletch,sess ( I know he's off ) etc etc, then the ones deemed mediocre are peddled. Paolo has obviously put n'diaye in that category.I didn't see owt wrong with him as a player either tbh and thought there was definite room for improvement. But perhaps he isn't the type of midfielder that Paolo wanted or perhaps it was wages. Personally, I think it's a bit of both.
you're not allowed to say that, its negative.![]()
It leaves us 12 months further down the line, while the scouts and dof have been doing their stuff hopefully.Yes we need someone, but when Celustka, Ki and Buttner (should they sign) bugger off back to their clubs, it leaves us where we are now - no full backs and short in midfield. We need to stop trying to plug holes with short term solutions or else we will never progress.