Roker Skate
Central Defender
Because a jury of peers can be presented with dodgy evidence.Web Sleuthing seems to be a popular phenomenon these days. Loads of people having an opinion based off what they read on the Internet and being certain of miscarriages of justice despite a jury of peers listening to all of the evidence and reaching a different conclusion. That's bad enough, but they often feel their opinion on ballistics is as valid as an expert or that their knowledge of the law surpasses lawyers and judges. It's bizarre.
As for experts having an opinion.. Gun experts raise doubts over Jeremy Bamber murder verdict