smoker
Striker
No but youre comparing a very good side to a very average one there.
Alreet then. Would Strauss's team have let a side back into it from 63/6?
India are a very inexperienced team playing outside their comfort zone.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No but youre comparing a very good side to a very average one there.
Alreet then. Would Strauss's team have let a side back into it from 63/6?
India are a very inexperienced team playing outside their comfort zone.
No, but they had Swann.
What use would Swann be on a first day fast/swing bowlers' wicket?
Decision to play Woakes over Finn or Stokes was a poor one.
No but youre comparing a very good side to a very average one there.
Shane Warne doesn't live in Manchester thoughBoycott saying this pitch is superb and all test grounds should be looking to have similar pitches.
If you win the toss and its sunny, with clear blue skies, you bat. If you win the toss and its cloudy and muggy, you pause for a moment, then you still bat.
Shane Warne
Foot off the gas? India have bowled well.
Finn and Stokes would have been a lot better, shocking decision to go with the poorer bowlers.No, but they had Swann.
We have two very good front liners and two absolutely shite back ups. India were blown away by our top two and got a few runs once they were out of the game. Once they came back in, gone!
Swann was dangerous most of the time regardless. Im not even sure of the point of this? I slate Cooks captaincy more than most, but im not hammering him when A) we basically have two good quicks as our attack and B) we still rolled them out for nowt.
This is turning into a good test match, gerrin.
As someone pointed out on here yesterday, we seem to select our bowlers for their battingFinn and Stokes would have been a lot better, shocking decision to go with the poorer bowlers.
Finn and Stokes would have been a lot better, shocking decision to go with the poorer bowlers.
His average is 222 with the ball and I don't see it dropping in the second innings.Chosen for their batting. Thought Woakes deserved another go after Southampton but he's been poor - not even economical to offset his wicketlessness.
As someone pointed out on here yesterday, we seem to select our bowlers for their batting
Those dark clouds in the distance are over my flat (it's raining in Didsbury), it's not moving towards the ground. I'm not saying any other clouds aren't approaching it though!Me. Getting like a stuck record!
Is Jordan really that much better than Stokes with the bat to merit his lack of cutting edge? On a par with dropping Dominic Cork to play Chris Lewis.
Jimmy has shown he can bat against this lot, which would offset Finn's capabilities. Broad is no mug with the bat either, how deep does Cook need the batting?
Good partnership by these two BTW! Gan on Rooty.
Pankaj, Ashwin and Jadeja offernig little on this wicket. Runs to be had if we see off Kumar and Aaron.
Rain on its way....![]()
Part timerThose dark clouds in the distance are over my flat (it's raining in Didsbury), it's not moving towards the ground. I'm not saying any other clouds aren't approaching it though!