★★★★ SAFC vs Luton Match Thread ★★★★

[Sheep farmer]

All the incidents here : Sunderland Transfer Rumours

Like the way their lad rolls around on the floor holding his face after he elbowed Baldwin?. Just shows how they all try to con the ref.

 

[0321safc]

People who are condemning Maguire for that challenge either simply don't like him or have lost their dummy because we didn't win.
You simply can't tell what he did from the footage, if he did anything at all. It certainly doesn't look much. And the referee sent him off as an afterthought.

At the time I couldn’t understand it. Seen several replays and honestly can’t see what I’m supposed to be looking at. Referees are sucking the life out of me and I’m questioning the integrity of the game.

 

[Hongkongphooey]

Cheers mate.

Stepped on him, aye that's a red.

It’s not like

Sorry but you can't defend Maguire there!

You can, we did, and it shows how much of a dick the ref was.

 

[woodlebert]

It’s not like


You can, we did, and it shows how much of a dick the ref was.

I think it was a red

 

[Hongkongphooey]

I think it was a red

Doesn’t matter , it was appealed and they said it wasn’t.

 

[woodlebert]

Doesn’t matter , it was appealed and they said it wasn’t.

Ok nice one pal

 

[Falconhoof]

It’s not like


You can, we did, and it shows how much of a dick the ref was.

I think he knew exactly what he was doing and has got away with it.

I'm not gonna complain like as I wouldn't want him banned but I think he's lucky.

 

[Hongkongphooey]

I think he knew exactly what he was doing and has got away with it.

I'm not gonna complain like as I wouldn't want him banned but I think he's lucky.

How is he lucky?, it was never a red

 

[Falconhoof]

How is he lucky?, it was never a red

Because I think he knew exactly what he was doing sticking his boot in after the original foul

 

[Hongkongphooey]

Because I think he knew exactly what he was doing sticking his boot in after the original foul

He went to kick the ball, never ever a red card, and it’s been proven it wasn’t

 

[Morse]

Why is it that even though Maguire has been cleared by a panel who have intensively studied the evidence, some of which we may not have seen, some people still think that not only was it still a red, even worse he deliberately set out to injure their player?!

Let it go, ffs. It’s alright to say ‘I was wrong’! Go on, try it. Stop slagging the lad off, ffs.

 

[mackemsafc1959]

Because I think he knew exactly what he was doing sticking his boot in after the original foul

Hahaha

Why is it that even though Maguire has been cleared by a panel who have intensively studied the evidence, some of which we may not have seen, some people still think that not only was it still a red, even worse he deliberately set out to injure their player?!

Let it go, ffs. It’s alright to say ‘I was wrong’! Go on, try it. Stop slagging the lad off, ffs.

Mags will argue you blind

 

[wicketkeeper]

He Fookin did man, open ya eyes

What happened with the appeal again -open YOUR eyes.

The ball was nowhere near Maguire's foot as he leaned it in to the Luton's players back/head. f***ing stupid it was

Appeal won

 

[AC Mack]

Why is it that even though Maguire has been cleared by a panel who have intensively studied the evidence, some of which we may not have seen, some people still think that not only was it still a red, even worse he deliberately set out to injure their player?!

Let it go, ffs. It’s alright to say ‘I was wrong’! Go on, try it. Stop slagging the lad off, ffs.

Not that I'm one of those people, but they don't need to change their own mind just because a decision has been reversed.

 

[wicketkeeper]

Deffo red for maguire.

foul by Flanagan for the pen anarl.

REALLY

 

[Mary Hinge]

What happened with the appeal again -open YOUR eyes.
Appeal won

Its Fookin Probertism man

 

[Voice of fair play]

Why is it that even though Maguire has been cleared by a panel who have intensively studied the evidence, some of which we may not have seen, some people still think that not only was it still a red, even worse he deliberately set out to injure their player?!

Let it go, ffs. It’s alright to say ‘I was wrong’! Go on, try it. Stop slagging the lad off, ffs.

That’s the key point once it been studied after watching countless replays it must be right, that’s the point mistakes can be made in real time, but if he has been cleared after replays of course he has done nothing wrong.

 

[bernardbresslaw]

I think it was a red

I'm starting to think you could be a mag?

 

[woodlebert]

I'm starting to think you could be a mag?

Just thought it was a fair red. Looked like a stamp on a felled player to me

 

[Guinness Guzzler]

Why is it that even though Maguire has been cleared by a panel who have intensively studied the evidence, some of which we may not have seen, some people still think that not only was it still a red, even worse he deliberately set out to injure their player?!

Let it go, ffs. It’s alright to say ‘I was wrong’! Go on, try it. Stop slagging the lad off, ffs.

This. I didn't comment one way or the other because I didn't get a great view at the match and haven't seen it since but if it's been overturned then we must have been able to prove beyond any doubt that he didn't set out to injure the player and that it was accidental. Generally speaking they don't like overturning decisions, if it's a tight call they'll go with the referee's decision to avoid undermining him, they'll only overturn it when it's pretty clear that it was a bad error from the ref. Let's just support the lad, and continue to fume that the arsehole ref robbed us of a few more minutes with a man advantage when level in a big game