• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

West Ham United Club Statement


Is it bad ? Yes

But it always fails to amaze me people are shocked this goes on… why do you think attractive women do so well in mid level jobs with coked up sleazy managers hiring and promoting them ?
It does go on but it's very much the minority.

Almost all of the women I've worked with seemed to be well aware that they must be as good as or better than their male peers.
 
Not excusing Sullivan. However, the 'lad mag' and Sport newspaper stuff was pretty much part of the culture of the day. Many of us were of an age where we would have been indulged in it. It was 30 years ago though and we learn to reflect and realise that it isn't correct, like we have with many other things over time.
 
Sullivan made a fortune in a morally questionable industry.

His MO involved the sale of goods which he surely knew (FFS!) were misrepresented.

He should be the last person to be surprised that his behaviour and business practices would come back to haunt him at some point.
 
Sullivan made a fortune in a morally questionable industry.

His MO involved the sale of goods which he surely knew (FFS!) were misrepresented.

He should be the last person to be surprised that his behaviour and business practices would come back to haunt him at some point.
This isn't about his business and how he made money. It's about his behaviour and allegations of the acts he carried out. He actually made his money through his investment company and renting out high end business property. What's more 'morally' wrong than selling sex toys is using football to legitimise himself.
 
This isn't about his business and how he made money. It's about his behaviour and allegations of the acts he carried out. He actually made his money through his investment company and renting out high end business property. What's more 'morally' wrong than selling sex toys is using football to legitimise himself.
Of course it's about his business and how he made his money.

He was the UK porn king which is where he made enough money to use to legitimise his business rep
 
The newspapers he owned would publish photos of topless girls on their 16th birthday

Which meant that the photos were taken before they were 16 and were child porn. The daft thing is that people knew this was child porn, but when the Government tried to ban it there were massive outcries and protests from people who liked wanking over 15 year old girls

Even at the time it was grotesque.
 
Porn kingpin in sleazy casting couch shocker. Not exactly news is it. Papers openly used to refer to his record in that department. I’m surprised anyone is surprised that he’s a dirt bag.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top