• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Southampton spying compendium thread


He was seen so legged it?

I picked up on a snippet that implied at least two other occasions of spying, which means Southampton are repeat offenders and might have denied another team the play-off spot they managed to claim.

It can't be let go.

They admitted to spying on 2 other teams in their written submission, but I simply don't believe they spied on Oxford in November then left it to Ipswich the next year then Boro?

As I posted earlier on the thread their manager is famous for his meticulous team preparation, and spends the 3 training days before every match specifically focusing on set pieces and set up against the upcoming opposition. The whistleblower also said they often discussed which set plays the opposition might use and how to counteract them in meetings and during training. Also a number of teams have apparently discussed through the season how good Southampton were at dead ball routines and how surprisingly well they nullified opposing dead ball situations.

I reckon it was systematic through the staff and systematic over the league.
 
There looks like there is some sympathy for the Southampton players. Gan canny on that one.
There is apparently ( according to The skunks resident journo Luke Edwards) photos of the intern ( the spy) dressed in military camouflage kit having a laugh and giggle with the players way before the Middlesbrough jaunt.
It would be class if that was true!

Seriously though, chances are the players would have known about this if Salty Bill was a technical analysis close to the manager. Presumably his ‘findings’ on each occasion were presented in team meetings or on the training ground.
 
They admitted to spying on 2 other teams in their written submission, but I simply don't believe they spied on Oxford in November then left it to Ipswich the next year then Boro?

As I posted earlier on the thread their manager is famous for his meticulous team preparation, and spends the 3 training days before every match specifically focusing on set pieces and set up against the upcoming opposition. The whistleblower also said they often discussed which set plays the opposition might use and how to counteract them in meetings and during training. Also a number of teams have apparently discussed through the season how good Southampton were at dead ball routines and how surprisingly well they nullified opposing dead ball situations.

I reckon it was systematic through the staff and systematic over the league.
They've admitted to the ones they know there's implicit messages for. It'll have happened for every game no doubt about it.
 
But I can't see how else it could have been done.

1. Let Southampton play the final against Hull - potentially rewarding them for cheating (when it's quite feasible that they shouldn't even have QUALIFIED for the play-offs), which in turns tells every other club that it's worth the risk of being caught cheating.

2. Scrap the final altogether and just promote Hull - It could be argued that they deserve that because their 'fellow finalists' are now disqualified so there is no opposition. But, their other potential opponents were denied their chance of a final place because they were cheated against., and surely promoting a club after just the semi final devalues the competition - especially when Hull aren't the club that have been cheated (by Southampton).

Of course it's not ideal, but what were they meant to do?
Southampton HAD to be dealt with and the play off final needs to go ahead (for various reasons), it can't be delayed by much cos of other things looming (players needing to be released for world cup duties etc).
Not disagreeing that it was difficult for EFL and the weight of opinion on here (i kna !) seems to indicate most think was correct decision…..just tough on Hull .
Fwiw ( absolutely nowt ) think you will get through .
 
I don’t buy into the narrative that its unfair to Hull because they would be preparing for Southampton and now all of a sudden they have to prepare for Boro

They will have been aware that this was a possible outcome and will have planned accordingly.

Also it implies training is all about concentrating on the opposition. You develop your own tactics and routines and then also look at the particular threat of the opposition. They’ve still got plenty of time to do this

and if they get really stuck for ideas they know where Boro’s training ground is, and that there’s a nice golf course nearby
 
Yes I agree. Just saying credit to the fan I know for not playing victim, like their forum seems to be
I can see what you mean but there is still a large percentage of fans on that forum saying they’ve been hard done by and playing a victim in the eyes of Gibson and the EFL. Granted it’s shit for them but they need to be looking at their own club, although they’re likely frustrated and lashing out as they’ll rightly miss out on the premier league money
 
Exactly. Ipswich you can understand to a degree but why would they do it against Oxford if they weren’t doing it against everyone else?
Makes it even funnier that they only admitted to Oxford due to messages, there was no CCTV available from Oxford on the day of the offence and then they lost that game anyway :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
This is probably screwed Southampton for years.

If culpable they will likely lose most of their sporting management.

The ownership will likely never recover so would be surprised if they are there much longer. Their fans understandable won’t forgive them.

Might well face years of legal action and compensation claims if the scale is as it’s suggested.

And now their own players at worst looking to sue them. At best there will be a mass of exits in the summer. Apparently exploring with the PFA breach of contracts which would enable them to leave for free.

Pretty much every aspect of the club set back years from this.
 
I can see what you mean but there is still a large percentage of fans on that forum saying they’ve been hard done by and playing a victim in the eyes of Gibson and the EFL. Granted it’s shit for them but they need to be looking at their own club, although they’re likely frustrated and lashing out as they’ll rightly miss out on the premier league money
Tbh it probably illustrates the difference between off/online fans

I know there are lots online saying it, I’m talking about the single Southampton fan I know in real life. Their reaction, rightly, is anger at the club
 
This is probably screwed Southampton for years.

If culpable they will likely lose most of their sporting management.

The ownership will likely never recover so would be surprised if they are there much longer. Their fans understandable won’t forgive them.

Might well face years of legal action and compensation claims if the scale is as it’s suggested.

And now their own players at worst looking to sue them. At best there will be a mass of exits in the summer. Apparently exploring with the PFA breach of contracts which would enable them to leave for free.

Pretty much every aspect of the club set back years from this.
This mate 👌
Can see administration
As players can walk away for free breach of contract
 
Tbh it probably illustrates the difference between off/online fans

I know there are lots online saying it, I’m talking about the single Southampton fan I know in real life. Their reaction, rightly, is anger at the club
Yeah fair point. It’s poor for the fans more so as it’s an utter embarrassment
 
Back
Top