• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Who remembers John Beck the Cambridge boss


Successful stint in charge

Got Cambridge from the 4th Division to the brink of the top flite just before football was invented.
Proper football. Get the ball forward as quick as possible, no diving for free kicks (only diving for penalties allowed ) and woe betide a goalkeeper if he strayed to the edge of his penalty box, never mind leave it.
I think it was Cambridge who spoilt the start of Billy Elliott's spell at Sunderland as a caretaker manager. Hardly anyone noticed. Football was underground then, compared to now.
 
Proper football. Get the ball forward as quick as possible, no diving for free kicks (only diving for penalties allowed ) and woe betide a goalkeeper if he strayed to the edge of his penalty box, never mind leave it.
I think it was Cambridge who spoilt the start of Billy Elliott's spell at Sunderland as a caretaker manager. Hardly anyone noticed. Football was underground then, compared to now.
I almost bit there
 
Wasn't he one of the first to give the ballboys towels to dry the ball for better grip for long throw ins
 
His theory was basically just get the ball in the opposition box, free kicks, open play, throw ins, get it in there.
It wasn’t his theory, he just employed it widely. It was the theory of Charles Hughes. Hughes identified that [up to the time of his research, which would have been the mid-70’s] the majority of goals were scored with 3 or fewer passes from restarting play. Hughes interpreted his findings / data to suggest that a team would never score enough goals by passing the ball around, and that to be successful teams needed to get the ball into the penalty area as quickly as possible from a restart of play. He wrote books and coaching manuals based on this interpretation. John Beck read them all and followed the format to the maximum. To be fair, it was relatively successful, I seem to remember that he was a play off defeat away from taking Cambridge from Division 4 to Division 1 in consecutive seasons.
Based on the science of Charles Hughes a leading coach at the F.A. Getting the ball into positions or maximum opportunity (POMO) within a few passes was the aim.

It worked quite well for lower league clubs who adopted the tactics closely like Cambridge and the Wimbledon Crazy Gang.

Beat me to it!
 
A lot of stuff he did like ice baths have been adopted.

Whilst his football was long ball and physical I think Ferguson trusted him with Beckhams development at PNE.
 
It wasn’t his theory, he just employed it widely. It was the theory of Charles Hughes. Hughes identified that [up to the time of his research, which would have been the mid-70’s] the majority of goals were scored with 3 or fewer passes from restarting play. Hughes interpreted his findings / data to suggest that a team would never score enough goals by passing the ball around, and that to be successful teams needed to get the ball into the penalty area as quickly as possible from a restart of play. He wrote books and coaching manuals based on this interpretation. John Beck read them all and followed the format to the maximum. To be fair, it was relatively successful, I seem to remember that he was a play off defeat away from taking Cambridge from Division 4 to Division 1 in consecutive seasons.

Beat me to it!
So while the Dutch were just about perfecting 'Total Football' the English FA were advising getting it in the mixer and keep the grass long in the corners. Explains why we were years behind everyone else internationally and what an incredible job Sir Bobby Robson did to reach a WC Qtr and Semi Final.

Tbh I like that there are different ways of winning but would prefer the tests of strength to be confined to the rugby pitch. It does seem almost unique to the British game though?
 
Back
Top