• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Isak


Really unlucky for the lad, it’s been a hard time to date since the transfer. I think he’s too good not to come good again, but injuries are always a worry just look at the last few years for LND.

The Mags did well out of the deal in hindsight. But how they’re doing this year in part shows how good Isak was. Top drawer, imagine where we could be in the league this year if we had a 25 goal striker?!
 
The thing is, they didn’t really need him?! They were better off not signing him and letting him destroy the Newcastle dressing room, imo!!
Yes, because what they saw as an asset to them would've been better suited as a spoiler in a dressing room for SAFC fans to laugh at. Makes perfect sense that in the grand scheme of things. That's definitely what Liverpool would've done.


Christ
 
Yes, because what they saw as an asset to them would've been better suited as a spoiler in a dressing room for SAFC fans to laugh at. Makes perfect sense that in the grand scheme of things. That's definitely what Liverpool would've done.


Christ
It was a top 4 and Champions League opponent.. nothing to do with Sunderland. You think 125 million for Isak was good business for Liverpool??
 
Really unlucky for the lad, it’s been a hard time to date since the transfer. I think he’s too good not to come good again, but injuries are always a worry just look at the last few years for LND.

The Mags did well out of the deal in hindsight. But how they’re doing this year in part shows how good Isak was. Top drawer, imagine where we could be in the league this year if we had a 25 goal striker?!
Imagine where we could be if we had some 5 goal midfielders.
 
Back
Top